|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
August 26th 04, 07:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:10:56 GMT, "Chip Jones"
wrote: Ron, that sounds basically good to me. I would "chunk" that information so it didn't all go out in the same transmission. My stab at it: "Fly heading 270 to intecept the HCH060R, direct MINES when able." Followed by: "Maintain 5000 until MINES, cleared VOR/DME approach Rockwood, report procedure turn inbound." With the PT language there is no doubt that I didn't vector to final. Yes, it's probably more difficult for the pilot to screw things up when you "chunk" it. And when he got to MINES, absent a further clearance (radio congestion or whatever) there'd be no question that he should go into the hold, until cleared for the approach. --ron 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| where to ask question about approach? | J Haggerty | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 17th 04 06:30 AM |
| Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 04:03 PM |
| Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | May 6th 04 04:19 AM |
| Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |
| Established on the approach - Checkride question | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 59 | October 6th 03 04:36 PM |
Threaded Mode