![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote:
I like the recommendations made in Peter Dogan's book, The Instrument Flight Training Manual. However, as your instructor said, there is no single right power setting. If you assume no wind conditions, then a 90K approach speed works well as that yields close to 90 knots ground speed (not exact due to the descent angle, but really close) which matches up with one entry in the time charts for timed approaches. Don't forget that 90 K indicated airspeed only equals 90 knots ground speed at sea level on a standard day with no wind. At higher altitudes, your TAS (and GS depending on the wind) will be significantly higher. Regardless, I agree with most of your post. I find the Dogan-style performance numbers are a good starting point, and help to get configuration changes stabilized. It does then require tweaking to suit the specific conditions, though. Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
VFR position reporting | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 154 | November 26th 06 04:45 PM |
IFR Approach questions | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | November 7th 05 02:11 AM |
Approaches and takeoff mins. | jamin3508 | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | September 14th 05 02:51 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |