A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Transponder Inspection Not Required?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old May 5th 08, 03:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Chip Bearden
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 69
Default Transponder Inspection Not Required?

On May 4, 9:52*am, Steve wrote:
This is a curious question. Presumably you went to the expense and
bother to install the transponder so that ATC and TCAS equipped aircraft
can determine your position and altitude and take appropriate action. If
your equipment isn't working properly, then when you most need it the
other aircraft won't have the correct info they need to avoid a collision.

This is safety equipment. If you're going to carry it, get it properly
maintained. Do you get your parachute repacked regularly? Same issue.

Steve


You are correct. It is safety equipment, as I noted in my original
posting: i.e., "Ignoring the safety issues of flying around
with a transponder that may not be reporting accurate info..." It is
also true that many pilots (including me) have been dissuaded from
purchasing and installing transponders not only because of cost but
because of the additional burden of initial and periodic inspection.
Your logic could also be applied to argue against glider pilots being
allowed to switch off transponders when not in crowded airspace in
order to save limited battery power, something that many within our
movement advocate. Frankly, your argument could also be used to
require universal use of transponders. There's always a way to
"mandate" additional safety, by requiring more equipment, more
training, more licensing, or simply by prohibiting flying gliders in
the first place. The question most of us want answered is how best to
balance safety with the practical considerations of the real world.
Some have argued that it would be better if more glider pilots
installed transponders even if they didn't always switch them on. My
question--while not taking sides--leads to a similar thought: might it
be better if more glider pilots installed transponders even if they
weren't all inspected within 24 months so long as we're not using them
for IFR purposes?

I'm still not sure of the regulatory question. For the record,
however, I wasn't advocating a position. This is a relatively
unfamiliar area to me. On the subject of parachute packing (not to
open this subject again; let's save it for the off season!), I have
occasionally been guilty of strapping on a chute that was out of
repack interval on the theory that this is safer than wearing no chute
at all, in particular when the only person who would be harmed if the
chute doesn't work is me.

Chip Bearden
ASW 24 "JB"
USA
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
transponder inspection Matt Owning 10 November 5th 05 09:41 PM
ELT Required for all SSA sanctioned contests starting 2006 ELT Required for all SSA sanctione Steve Leonard Soaring 2 September 14th 05 03:49 AM
Pre-buy Inspection Jon Kraus Owning 49 September 1st 04 12:42 PM
Pre-buy Inspection Jon Kraus Piloting 46 September 1st 04 12:42 PM
100 Hr Inspection Scott D. General Aviation 6 August 15th 04 01:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.