![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -In your case, I assume that you are flying either far enough horizontally -away from or high enough above the antennas for safety. Let's say a minimum -of 1/2 mile horizontally. Now lets assume that the strongest broadcast -signal is 100,000 watts "effective radiated power" and a frequency somewhere -around 100 MHz. In a metropolitan area 100kW ERP would rank you in the lower third of broadcast signals, but for grins and giggles, let's make that presumption. At a distance of 1/2 statute mile the power from that -signal that would be picked up by an aircraft com antenna would be about 10 -milliwatts. More like 5 milliwatts, but let's not debate how many milliwatts can dance on the head of a dipole. This is a spectacularly strong signal for purposes of -reception, and certainly more than enough to make it impossible for the -attached receiver to pick up any other signal, but nowhere near strong -enough to cause the receiver, if not otherwise powered, to generate and -re-radiate an intermodulation product. Oopsie. 10 milliwatts is about 0.7 volts RMS, or about a volt peak. If for whatever reason that front end were wide open to the interfering signal, a volt is sure as little green apples capable of turning on the B-E diode of the RF amplifier. Now any lower power signal is perfectly capable of being mixed with our newfound "LO" and being reradiated. - -So, if the signal WERE strong enough to provide enough power to cause an -otherwise unpowered receiver to generate and re-radiate an interfering -signal, the same powerful signal would pretty much wipe out operation of any -other nearby receiver that IS powered on. Ah, no. NOt if the other receiver had enough filtering in the front end to get rid of it. - -By all accounts, what you have is plain old garden variety intermodulation -interference. The intermodulation products doing the interfering are being -generated in the same receiver that is being interfered with. In an earlier -post I offered a relatively simple way to prove this. I'm not debating that it is intermod. I don't know. I'm not there. But front end reradiation is a phenomenon that should be investigated also. And, for that matter, that is exactly why two brands of ELT have had factory recalls...the C-B junction in the output transistor was a wonderful intermod generator. Jim Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
September issue of Airman available | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 2nd 04 04:39 AM |
Bogus Issue | jls | Home Built | 2 | August 15th 04 04:47 AM |
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Home Built | 78 | December 3rd 03 09:10 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |
September issue of Afterburner now on line | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 9th 03 09:13 PM |