A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Planes & Cell phones



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 21st 04, 01:45 AM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:35:03 -0500, FUji wrote:

Huh? Maximum output of most handheld cell phones is 0.6 watts with the old
in-car and bag phones going up to 3 watts. It can't output more than it's
maximum no matter how far you are away from the tower. The radius of
interference from 0.6 watt phones transmitting from inside an aluminum can
would be rather small. And it's a little hard to imagine a plane full of
people with bag phones.


I thought I might just toss this out there. I quickly looked. I did not
have any trouble finding modern, handheld phones, with 2-watts output.
So, I think it's safe to say that we know for sure it's at least 2-watts.

  #2  
Old April 21st 04, 01:53 AM
James Robinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Greg Copeland wrote:

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:35:03 -0500, FUji wrote:

Huh? Maximum output of most handheld cell phones is 0.6 watts with the old
in-car and bag phones going up to 3 watts. It can't output more than it's
maximum no matter how far you are away from the tower. The radius of
interference from 0.6 watt phones transmitting from inside an aluminum can
would be rather small. And it's a little hard to imagine a plane full of
people with bag phones.


I thought I might just toss this out there. I quickly looked. I did not
have any trouble finding modern, handheld phones, with 2-watts output.
So, I think it's safe to say that we know for sure it's at least 2-watts.


Both of my run-of-the-mill Nokias have a maximum transmit power of 600
mW. They are two different digital/analog models.
  #3  
Old April 21st 04, 02:13 AM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:53:13 +0000, James Robinson wrote:

Greg Copeland wrote:

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:35:03 -0500, FUji wrote:

Huh? Maximum output of most handheld cell phones is 0.6 watts with the old
in-car and bag phones going up to 3 watts. It can't output more than it's
maximum no matter how far you are away from the tower. The radius of
interference from 0.6 watt phones transmitting from inside an aluminum can
would be rather small. And it's a little hard to imagine a plane full of
people with bag phones.


I thought I might just toss this out there. I quickly looked. I did not
have any trouble finding modern, handheld phones, with 2-watts output.
So, I think it's safe to say that we know for sure it's at least 2-watts.


Both of my run-of-the-mill Nokias have a maximum transmit power of 600
mW. They are two different digital/analog models.


Well, that's an interesting point. I know if I leave my phone on in the
air, it tends to degrade to analog mode (dual band phone). While I am
aware the digital mode uses far less power (just didn't realize that
little), perhaps the 5-watt maximum number is representative of phones
operating in analog mode? I dunno. That's my best guess.



  #4  
Old April 21st 04, 02:14 AM
FUji
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Greg Copeland" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:35:03 -0500, FUji wrote:

Huh? Maximum output of most handheld cell phones is 0.6 watts with the

old
in-car and bag phones going up to 3 watts. It can't output more than

it's
maximum no matter how far you are away from the tower. The radius of
interference from 0.6 watt phones transmitting from inside an aluminum

can
would be rather small. And it's a little hard to imagine a plane full

of
people with bag phones.


I thought I might just toss this out there. I quickly looked. I did not
have any trouble finding modern, handheld phones, with 2-watts output.
So, I think it's safe to say that we know for sure it's at least 2-watts.


0.7 watts is the maximum that is considered "safe" for handheld use by
medical experts. Any more than that gets your brain frying, so they say.
;-)

I've had cell phones for fifteen years (novatel, motorola, mitsubishi, etc.)
and all the handhelds except the ericssons were 0.6 watts. The ericssons
were only 0.5 watts! Way back then I remember if you complained about bad
reception with a handheld they'd tell you to "upgrade" to a transportable.

Any links or names of the ones you found?


  #5  
Old April 21st 04, 02:24 AM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:14:23 -0500, FUji wrote:

"Greg Copeland" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:35:03 -0500, FUji wrote:

Huh? Maximum output of most handheld cell phones is 0.6 watts with the

old
in-car and bag phones going up to 3 watts. It can't output more than

it's
maximum no matter how far you are away from the tower. The radius of
interference from 0.6 watt phones transmitting from inside an aluminum

can
would be rather small. And it's a little hard to imagine a plane full

of
people with bag phones.


I thought I might just toss this out there. I quickly looked. I did not
have any trouble finding modern, handheld phones, with 2-watts output.
So, I think it's safe to say that we know for sure it's at least 2-watts.


0.7 watts is the maximum that is considered "safe" for handheld use by
medical experts. Any more than that gets your brain frying, so they say.
;-)

I've had cell phones for fifteen years (novatel, motorola, mitsubishi, etc.)
and all the handhelds except the ericssons were 0.6 watts. The ericssons
were only 0.5 watts! Way back then I remember if you complained about bad
reception with a handheld they'd tell you to "upgrade" to a transportable.

Any links or names of the ones you found?


http://www.hazardousareadirect.com/P...EX-HANDY04.htm
http://www.phonemerchants.com/poda3wadubac.html

All I did was a quick google and this was the first one that popped up.
It says, 2 watts, 1 watts, and 1 watts for it's maximum output for the
three supports networks. It is a tri-band phone.

The second link is a power amplifier which cranks output up to 3-watts.
Keep in mind, just bacause a phone may output less than maximum power,
doesn't have to mean they are not allowed to output higher. Perhaps we're
playing with semantics here. Perhaps the maximum allowed is 5-watts? And
most phones output less? I dunno. At any rate, right off the bat, I
didn't have any trouble finding a phone that has a maximum output of
2-watts.


  #6  
Old April 21st 04, 02:45 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Greg Copeland wrote:

I thought I might just toss this out there. I quickly looked. I did not
have any trouble finding modern, handheld phones, with 2-watts output.


They almost certainly are not cell phones. Probably PCS.

George Patterson
This marriage is off to a shaky start. The groom just asked the band to
play "Your cheatin' heart", and the bride just requested "Don't come home
a'drinkin' with lovin' on your mind".
  #7  
Old April 21st 04, 09:29 AM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 01:45:25 +0000, G.R. Patterson III wrote:



Greg Copeland wrote:

I thought I might just toss this out there. I quickly looked. I did not
have any trouble finding modern, handheld phones, with 2-watts output.


They almost certainly are not cell phones. Probably PCS.


I'm using layman's terminology, which would cover PCM, GSM, etc, etc, etc...

  #8  
Old April 21st 04, 03:08 PM
Kyler Laird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Greg Copeland writes:

They almost certainly are not cell phones. Probably PCS.


I'm using layman's terminology, which would cover PCM, GSM, etc, etc, etc...


Oh, surely not! NOBODY (except me) calls those "cell phones".
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e... earthlink.net

Good thing we still have George around to explain this to us. I think we've
lost the brilliant educator Jerry Bransford.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain

--kyler
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 December 30th 04 11:16 AM
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 April 15th 04 06:17 AM
Cell phones with GPS Roger Halstead Piloting 0 December 24th 03 03:04 AM
Conspiracy Theorists (amusing) Grantland Military Aviation 1 October 2nd 03 12:17 AM
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box Jim Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 August 23rd 03 04:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.