![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
"VALID FOR STUDENT PILOT PURPOSES ONLY." This guy is a commercial/CFI like the rest of us. I've never seen this before. Is this a "solo" only medical?? -Robert, CFI when you have a medical condition that prevents you from getting a medical right away but requires a SODA, your initial certificate does bear that mention; it allows you to do all of your training just like any other student, including solo; unlike what someone else mentioned in this thread it doesn't require you to do the checkride with a FAA inspector; the way it usually works is that by the time you get ready for the checkride, you schedule an appointment with one of the inspector of the local FSDO for a 'medical flight check'; not a checkride per se, the inspector just wants to see if you can operate the aircraft safely and does not go through the PTS (said inspector is briefed by the FAA beforehand about what needs to be checked, each person and condition being different; in my case, partial paralysis of my legs, the guy wanted to see how I'd handle the rudders (I eventually did two such medical flight checks, since the SODA I got the first time was valid for class-III only; I went through the same process to upgrade to a class-II; I'll go for another flight check when upgrading to a class-I eventually -- then I should be done :-) as in my case the medical condition is not evolutive and the SODA was issued without expiration date or requirement for recheck which is also possible); someone with, say, a prosthetic arm would be checked differently, etc. really a neat way of doing it; when I did my PPL(A) in England, it was far more complicated: no solo allowed during the training... i.e., all the solo requirements were done with an instructor (yeah... weird), and logged as P u/s (pilot under supervision); then, after the checkride was passed, I had to redo the solo requirements for real this time, before being allowed to carry passengers; a bit more cumbersome than the FAA approach (but then again the British CAA was one of the very rare European civil aviation authorities that would even consider giving me a chance to demonstrate what I could do). now, I suppose (not sure about this one, just guessing) that if you acquire the medical condition requiring a SODA while you already have a pilot certificate that you might end up -- after a fair bit of paper work -- with the same restriction on your certificate until you get the SODA (via a medical flight check); that's how I would explain what you saw. --Sylvain |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Sport Pilot inconsistency | frustrated flier | Piloting | 19 | September 10th 04 04:53 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 06:11 AM |
Enlisted pilots | John Randolph | Naval Aviation | 41 | July 21st 03 02:11 PM |