![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message k.net... "Stan Prevost" wrote in message ... That does not define VFR conditions and is not permissive about operating below 1000 ft under VFR. FAR 91.155 most certainly does define VFR conditions 91.155(a) defines VFR conditions for each class of airspace. 91.155(c), which was the specific regulation you referenced, defines a prohibition against VFR operations under certain conditions in any airspace. and we are not discussing operating below 1000' AGL under VFR. The issue at hand is the requirement in the ATC manual for ATC to "ensure that weather conditions at the airport are VFR " as a condition to issuing a visual approach clearance. VFR conditions are defined in 91.155(a) subject to an additional Class G permissive rule in 91.155(b) and prohibitions against operations under certain conditions in (c) for all airspace and (d) in B/C/D/E airspace. One still has to obey airspace cloud clearance rules. Only when one is operating VFR, we're discussing an IFR operation here. For VFR conditions to exist as required by 7110.65 7-4-3(b) in order to clear an aircraft for the IFR operation under discussion, one must be able to operate under VFR, including obeying cloud clearance rules. FAR 91.155(a) defines those conditions subject to additional restrictions in 91.155(c) and (d). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stan Prevost" wrote in message ... 91.155(a) defines VFR conditions for each class of airspace. Correct. 91.155(c), which was the specific regulation you referenced, defines a prohibition against VFR operations under certain conditions in any airspace. The question was, "Where does the 1000 come from?" The answer is FAR 91.155(c). The issue at hand is the requirement in the ATC manual for ATC to "ensure that weather conditions at the airport are VFR " as a condition to issuing a visual approach clearance. VFR conditions are defined in 91.155(a) subject to an additional Class G permissive rule in 91.155(b) and prohibitions against operations under certain conditions in (c) for all airspace and (d) in B/C/D/E airspace. Correct. For VFR conditions to exist as required by 7110.65 7-4-3(b) in order to clear an aircraft for the IFR operation under discussion, one must be able to operate under VFR, including obeying cloud clearance rules. That is not correct. The only IFR operation subject to VFR cloud clearance requirements is VFR-on-top. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message news ![]() 91.155(c), which was the specific regulation you referenced, defines a prohibition against VFR operations under certain conditions in any airspace. The question was, "Where does the 1000 come from?" The answer is FAR 91.155(c). That is the answer you gave. Why is it the correct answer? 91.155(c) does not define VFR conditions or permit any operation. It only prohibits certain operations under certain conditions. How does it contribute toward satisfying the rule ATC must follow to ensure that VFR conditions exist before issuing a clearance for a visual approach? For VFR conditions to exist as required by 7110.65 7-4-3(b) in order to clear an aircraft for the IFR operation under discussion, one must be able to operate under VFR, including obeying cloud clearance rules. That is not correct. The only IFR operation subject to VFR cloud clearance requirements is VFR-on-top. That is not correct. On a contact approach, the pilot must remain clear of clouds. However, I did not say that the IFR operation is subject to VFR cloud clearance rules. I said that for VFR conditions to exist, one must be able to operate under VFR, including obeying cloud clearance rules. In other words, VFR conditions are defined in 91.155(a). When the requirements of 91.155(a) are not met, VFR conditions do not exist and a visual approach clearance may not be issued in accordance with the ATC manual. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stan Prevost" wrote in message ... That is the answer you gave. Why is it the correct answer? Because that's where 1000' comes from. 91.155(c) does not define VFR conditions or permit any operation. It only prohibits certain operations under certain conditions. How does it contribute toward satisfying the rule ATC must follow to ensure that VFR conditions exist before issuing a clearance for a visual approach? The controller must ensure that weather conditions at the airport are VFR prior to issuing a visual approach clearance. If you have a ceiling of less than 1000' in a surface area you do not have VFR conditions and a visual approach is not available. That is not correct. On a contact approach, the pilot must remain clear of clouds. Yes, he must remain clear of clouds, which just happens to be the same as VFR cloud clearance requirements in Class B airspace and Class G airspace during the day. But VFR cloud clearance requirements are greater in Class C, D, and E airspace, and yet the pilot must still remain only clear of clouds on a contact approach. He does not have to follow VFR cloud clearance requirements on a contact approach or a visual approach. However, I did not say that the IFR operation is subject to VFR cloud clearance rules. I said that for VFR conditions to exist, one must be able to operate under VFR, including obeying cloud clearance rules. Yes, you said that. It's not true. In other words, VFR conditions are defined in 91.155(a). When the requirements of 91.155(a) are not met, VFR conditions do not exist and a visual approach clearance may not be issued in accordance with the ATC manual. That's true, but that does not mean that pilots must adhere to VFR cloud clearance requirements on a VFR approach. Whatever gave you the idea they did? What purpose would that serve? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
Contact approach question | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 114 | January 31st 05 06:40 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |