A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Contact Approach



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 14th 05, 11:11 PM
Stan Prevost
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
k.net...

"Stan Prevost" wrote in message
...

That does not define VFR conditions and is not permissive about operating
below 1000 ft under VFR.


FAR 91.155 most certainly does define VFR conditions


91.155(a) defines VFR conditions for each class of airspace. 91.155(c),
which was the specific regulation you referenced, defines a prohibition
against VFR operations under certain conditions in any airspace.

and we are not discussing operating below 1000' AGL under VFR.


The issue at hand is the requirement in the ATC manual for ATC to "ensure
that weather conditions at the airport are VFR " as a condition to issuing
a visual approach clearance. VFR conditions are defined in 91.155(a)
subject to an additional Class G permissive rule in 91.155(b) and
prohibitions against operations under certain conditions in (c) for all
airspace and (d) in B/C/D/E airspace.




One still has to obey airspace cloud clearance rules.


Only when one is operating VFR, we're discussing an IFR operation here.


For VFR conditions to exist as required by 7110.65 7-4-3(b) in order to
clear an aircraft for the IFR operation under discussion, one must be able
to operate under VFR, including obeying cloud clearance rules. FAR
91.155(a) defines those conditions subject to additional restrictions in
91.155(c) and (d).









  #2  
Old February 14th 05, 11:35 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stan Prevost" wrote in message
...

91.155(a) defines VFR conditions for each class of airspace.


Correct.



91.155(c), which was the specific regulation you referenced, defines a
prohibition
against VFR operations under certain conditions in any airspace.


The question was, "Where does the 1000 come from?" The answer is FAR
91.155(c).



The issue at hand is the requirement in the ATC manual for ATC to "ensure
that weather conditions at the airport are VFR " as a condition to
issuing
a visual approach clearance. VFR conditions are defined in 91.155(a)
subject to an additional Class G permissive rule in 91.155(b) and
prohibitions against operations under certain conditions in (c) for all
airspace and (d) in B/C/D/E airspace.


Correct.



For VFR conditions to exist as required by 7110.65 7-4-3(b) in order to
clear an aircraft for the IFR operation under discussion, one must be able
to operate under VFR, including obeying cloud clearance rules.


That is not correct. The only IFR operation subject to VFR cloud clearance
requirements is VFR-on-top.


  #3  
Old February 15th 05, 04:01 AM
Stan Prevost
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
news



91.155(c), which was the specific regulation you referenced, defines a
prohibition
against VFR operations under certain conditions in any airspace.


The question was, "Where does the 1000 come from?" The answer is FAR
91.155(c).


That is the answer you gave. Why is it the correct answer? 91.155(c) does
not define VFR conditions or permit any operation. It only prohibits
certain operations under certain conditions. How does it contribute toward
satisfying the rule ATC must follow to ensure that VFR conditions exist
before issuing a clearance for a visual approach?



For VFR conditions to exist as required by 7110.65 7-4-3(b) in order to
clear an aircraft for the IFR operation under discussion, one must be
able
to operate under VFR, including obeying cloud clearance rules.


That is not correct. The only IFR operation subject to VFR cloud
clearance requirements is VFR-on-top.


That is not correct. On a contact approach, the pilot must remain clear of
clouds.

However, I did not say that the IFR operation is subject to VFR cloud
clearance rules. I said that for VFR conditions to exist, one must be able
to operate under VFR, including obeying cloud clearance rules. In other
words, VFR conditions are defined in 91.155(a). When the requirements of
91.155(a) are not met, VFR conditions do not exist and a visual approach
clearance may not be issued in accordance with the ATC manual.




  #4  
Old February 15th 05, 04:30 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stan Prevost" wrote in message
...

That is the answer you gave. Why is it the correct answer?


Because that's where 1000' comes from.



91.155(c) does
not define VFR conditions or permit any operation. It only prohibits
certain operations under certain conditions. How does it contribute
toward
satisfying the rule ATC must follow to ensure that VFR conditions exist
before issuing a clearance for a visual approach?


The controller must ensure that weather conditions at the airport are VFR
prior to issuing a visual approach clearance. If you have a ceiling of less
than 1000' in a surface area you do not have VFR conditions and a visual
approach is not available.



That is not correct. On a contact approach, the pilot must remain clear
of
clouds.


Yes, he must remain clear of clouds, which just happens to be the same as
VFR cloud clearance requirements in Class B airspace and Class G airspace
during the day. But VFR cloud clearance requirements are greater in Class
C, D, and E airspace, and yet the pilot must still remain only clear of
clouds on a contact approach. He does not have to follow VFR cloud
clearance requirements on a contact approach or a visual approach.



However, I did not say that the IFR operation is subject to VFR cloud
clearance rules. I said that for VFR conditions to exist, one must be
able
to operate under VFR, including obeying cloud clearance rules.


Yes, you said that. It's not true.



In other
words, VFR conditions are defined in 91.155(a). When the requirements of
91.155(a) are not met, VFR conditions do not exist and a visual approach
clearance may not be issued in accordance with the ATC manual.


That's true, but that does not mean that pilots must adhere to VFR cloud
clearance requirements on a VFR approach. Whatever gave you the idea they
did? What purpose would that serve?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPS approach question Matt Whiting Instrument Flight Rules 30 August 29th 08 03:54 AM
Contact approach question Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 114 January 31st 05 06:40 PM
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? S. Ramirez Instrument Flight Rules 17 April 2nd 04 11:13 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.