![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Remde wrote:
Hi Eric, It does look somewhat interesting. The use of a hard drive makes it less interesting to me. I think your statement below comparing the iPAQ 3800 and 2200 is not quite correct. They are not the same technology. The 3800 was (if I remember correctly) "reflective" and the 2200 (and all recent iPAQs) are "transflective". That explains the difference in sunlight visibility (which I think is less dramatic a difference than many other glider pilots). I think you are right about the 2200/3800, (I couldn't find a reference to "reflective" for the 3800 in brochures I have, but I remember it being used with older models). But, it is still true that there is quite a variation between displays of the different units, even if all are using transflective screens, due to design and manufacturing choices. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Calling all aviation enthusiasts – this is your chance to see two classic RAF movies on the big screen (Hull - Yorkshire). | Phillip Rhodes | Military Aviation | 0 | September 7th 04 01:30 PM |
ANN: SoaringPilot 1.9.8 | Mark Hawkins | Soaring | 0 | April 21st 04 05:09 PM |
Rag and tube construction and computer models? | BllFs6 | Home Built | 24 | April 12th 04 12:20 PM |
Soaring Flight Computer Comparison - Help needed | Paul Remde | Soaring | 10 | January 29th 04 07:35 PM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |