![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:19:28 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
In article , wrote: On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 05:11:11 GMT, Greg Esres wrote: The directive to pilots is that only approaches labeled "GPS" can be flown with GPS. What does this mean, exactly? Must I turn off my GPS if I am flying a VOR or NDB approach? Will I lose my certificate if I look at my GPS during the approach? Will I lose my certificate if I look at the GPS more than I do the OBS/ADF? These generalized statements one finds in the AIM and elsewhere need to be examined for specific meanings. When that is done, one finds that most of them are absolute garbage. The AIM recommends that any unauthorized instruments have their displays covered with a ham sandwich when passing the final approach fix. I don't believe this is true. It has been demonstrated that some people navigate better with a ham sandwich than they can with either ADF or VOR. Therefore the ham sandwich would also be illegal. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|