![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
abripl wrote:
There is no problem with experimentals and IFR except maybe that some CFI's or examiners may not feel like flying in one - but that is an individual choice. For the record, I never suggested that there was a problem with experimentals and IFR. .... but I'm still curious. Doesn't your receiver's *installation* have to be approved for IFR, just like on a Cessna/Piper/Beech? When that installation is approved, don't you get an AFMS? Doesn't the AFMS spell out what database must be installed? Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave,
Just about everything on experimentals is "builder" approved. You install it and make an aircraft log book entry that it was correctly installed and tested. The exception is the required periodic IFR tests of pitot, transponder, etc. which has to be done by approved trained persons. Join rec.aviation.homebuilt news group and learn. There are advantages to experimentals. And there are disadvantages: takes several years to build one (many give up) and hull insurance is hard to get. -------------------------------------------------------- SQ2000 canard: http://www.abri.com/sq2000 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
abripl wrote:
Dave, Just about everything on experimentals is "builder" approved. You install it and make an aircraft log book entry that it was correctly installed and tested. The exception is the required periodic IFR tests of pitot, transponder, etc. which has to be done by approved trained persons. Join rec.aviation.homebuilt news group and learn. The annual condition inspection must be done by an approved person as well (either the holder of the repairman's certificate or an A&P). In addition, anything that would constitute a major modification to the aircraft requires FAA notification (though I've never heard of the FAA actually acting on any of these notifications). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron,
I have the repairmans certificate. Never heard of FAA refusing a repairmans certificate to the original builder (only). The newer FAA approved operating limitations do not require FAA notifications after major modifications, but compliance with 91.319(b) which in my aircraft operating limitations requires 5 hours of phase one flight testing and appropriate entry in the aircraft logbook. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Piloting | 10 | March 23rd 05 01:16 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Garmin GNS 530/430 spare data cards | David R. | Owning | 1 | March 11th 04 12:47 AM |
Ice meteors, climate, sceptics | Brian Sandle | General Aviation | 43 | February 24th 04 12:27 AM |
Garmin Emap Handheld GPS w/ Remote Antenna AND Data Transfer Cable | Cecil E. Chapman | Products | 0 | October 1st 03 02:06 AM |