![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() David Cartwright wrote: My local airport can get busy at times (reasonable amounts of GA, and we share the airfield with everything up to 767s) but we don't get a lot of "chasing down the runway". I've had a few "land after"s, but we've got 1,850m of runway and they're no problem (and anyway, it's only an invitation that one can decline, not an order). Also remember that as soon as the plane flies off the end of the runway the separation standard disapperars. So what was once 3000 feet goes to zero. I've not had a take-off clearance when they guy in front still had his wheels on the runway, Go to any big city airport. You will see jets touching down as the jet taking off still has his mains on the runway. You will see jets getting a takeoff clearance as the preceding jet departure is about 5000 feet down the runway and just starting to come up off the nosewheel. but I _have_ had plenty when he was only a hundred or two feet in the air. And the clearance was always of the form: "Departing traffic is a C152 [or whatever] turning left on departure; with that traffic in sight, cleared for take-off ...". He doesn't need to say all that, that's probably why the other guy is already 200 feet in the air, he's wasting air time. But that happens everywhere. We have a couple guys here that when they want you to start a turn early will actually say "when speed and altitude permit start your crosswind." I just sit there and laugh. I suspect the main thing the controller needs to be thinking is not so much the formal separation distance, but the consequences of two single-engine aircraft suffering an EFATO and having to set down - the last thing you need is a runway with one small "obvious" EFATO field at the end of it and two aircraft both heading for it at once! A plane has an engine failure is an emergency situation and the rules don't apply if we then have two on the runway. Been there, done that. Only if you have lined up under a "line up if able to commence immediate departure" do you have any compulsion to get your skates on! Man, that's cumbersome. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flight of two, IFR | Doug | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | January 13th 20 01:12 PM |
Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality | Chip Jones | Piloting | 125 | October 15th 04 07:42 PM |
Tower Enroute Control? | Sam Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | June 2nd 04 02:31 AM |
New Oshkosh Tower | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 03 05:35 PM |
Rwy incursions | Hankal | Piloting | 10 | November 16th 03 02:33 AM |