A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

IFR GPS certification



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 15th 05, 12:14 AM
Doug Carter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

M wrote:
I made the same decision against getting a IFR GPS and statyed with /U
on my plane. I did get a Garmin 196 and it works fabulously along with
my onboard VOR on IFR flights. I made this choice because nearly all
the airports that I fly IFR into have ILS.


Nothing wrong with this but more and more airports are getting GPS
approaches for the opposite and crossing directions to the ILS runways.

So if the wind doesn't work for the ILS runway you can make a straight
in approach instead the more dangerous circle to land from the ILS
option; lower minimums to boot.
  #2  
Old March 15th 05, 02:16 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doug Carter wrote:

So if the wind doesn't work for the ILS runway you can make a straight
in approach instead the more dangerous circle to land from the ILS
option; lower minimums to boot.


I haven't done a survey, but my impression is that the average straight in GPS
approach has higher minimums than the average ILS circling approach. I agree I'd
rather land straight in if possible, though.

DGB
  #3  
Old March 16th 05, 04:16 AM
Doug Carter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave Butler wrote:
Doug Carter wrote:

So if the wind doesn't work for the ILS runway you can make a straight
in approach instead the more dangerous circle to land from the ILS
option; lower minimums to boot.



I haven't done a survey, but my impression is that the average straight
in GPS approach has higher minimums than the average ILS circling
approach. I agree I'd rather land straight in if possible, though.

DGB


You may be correct but I looked at about a dozen airports in the
Southwest and in all cases the GPS approach was lower than the ILS
circling minimums.

Now that I think of it, I was looking at actual LNAV approaches, not
GPS overlays of NDB or VOR approaches. This could be a difference.
  #4  
Old March 15th 05, 11:19 PM
M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Interestingly enough, it seems that on the days when the ceiling/vis is
low enough to make circling approach difficult are also likely to be
the days when the wind is either very light or lined up with the ILS
straight-in direction.




Nothing wrong with this but more and more airports are getting GPS
approaches for the opposite and crossing directions to the ILS

runways.

So if the wind doesn't work for the ILS runway you can make a

straight
in approach instead the more dangerous circle to land from the ILS
option; lower minimums to boot.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adding IFR Plane Certification To Planes Without It Blanche Cohen Owning 10 November 29th 04 06:37 PM
Aircraft certification questions. psyshrike Home Built 40 November 22nd 04 06:10 PM
Aircraft certification questions. psyshrike Owning 42 November 22nd 04 06:10 PM
certification of composite aircraft sebastian Home Built 6 March 25th 04 03:48 PM
Aircraft engine certification FAR's Corky Scott Home Built 4 July 25th 03 06:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.