A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How to adhere to this obstacle departure procedure?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 21st 05, 10:15 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roy Smith wrote:

It only gets interesting when heading south and you need to make sure
you clear the 2849 tower (conveniently located smack in the middle of
the airway). In that case, what I would do is set 166 on the OBS and
if I wasn't at the 2300 required by the DP when the flag flipped from
TO to FROM, I'd do one lap in a racetrack pattern (even easier with a
moving map GPS).


I was wondering that, too. 2,300 at the VOR for a southbound course (I
omitted this section of the DP in my original post) only leaves about 6nm
or so to climb the additional 500 feet to clear that tower. Do-able,
assuming the pilot of the single-engine piston was really paying attention
to flying the aircraft. I agree with you that another safe lap around
would be prudent.

--
Peter


















----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #2  
Old April 21st 05, 11:37 PM
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter R. wrote:
Roy Smith wrote:

It only gets interesting when heading south and you need to make sure
you clear the 2849 tower (conveniently located smack in the middle of
the airway). In that case, what I would do is set 166 on the OBS and
if I wasn't at the 2300 required by the DP when the flag flipped from
TO to FROM, I'd do one lap in a racetrack pattern (even easier with a
moving map GPS).


I was wondering that, too. 2,300 at the VOR for a southbound course (I
omitted this section of the DP in my original post) only leaves about 6nm
or so to climb the additional 500 feet to clear that tower.


Only? That's a climb gradient of less than 100 feet per mile.

Do-able, assuming the pilot of the single-engine piston was really
paying attention to flying the aircraft.


I agree with you that another safe lap around would be prudent.


My comments about the shallow climb gradient notwithstanding, it's
more than prudent, it's required by the DP.

DEPARTURE PROCEDU Rwys 6, 15, climb runway
heading to 1200, then climbing left turn direct DKK
VORTAC before proceeding on course. Rwys 24, 33,
climb runway heading to 1200, then climbing right turn
direct DKK VORTAC before proceeding on course.
Southbound aircraft cross DKK VORTAC at or above
2300.


BTW, I think it's a little confusing the way this DP is worded. At
first glance, it looks like the requirement to cross DKK at or above
2300 only applies to 24 and 33 departures, but I'm pretty sure it
applies to all departures.
  #3  
Old April 22nd 05, 03:07 AM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roy Smith wrote:

Only? That's a climb gradient of less than 100 feet per mile.


OK, so that clears the tower by an inch or two, but I was thinking more of
the typical IFR obstacle clearance amount, which would be somewhere around
250 feet per mile.

--
Peter


















----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #4  
Old April 23rd 05, 01:42 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Peter R." wrote:

Roy Smith wrote:

Only? That's a climb gradient of less than 100 feet per mile.


OK, so that clears the tower by an inch or two, but I was thinking more of
the typical IFR obstacle clearance amount, which would be somewhere around
250 feet per mile.


If there is no climb gradient specified, a minimum of 200 feet is required. Anything
less than that and you are not protected. It's all in the AIM.

  #5  
Old April 23rd 05, 01:45 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Roy Smith wrote:



DEPARTURE PROCEDU Rwys 6, 15, climb runway
heading to 1200, then climbing left turn direct DKK
VORTAC before proceeding on course. Rwys 24, 33,
climb runway heading to 1200, then climbing right turn
direct DKK VORTAC before proceeding on course.
Southbound aircraft cross DKK VORTAC at or above
2300.


BTW, I think it's a little confusing the way this DP is worded. At
first glance, it looks like the requirement to cross DKK at or above
2300 only applies to 24 and 33 departures, but I'm pretty sure it
applies to all departures.


How do you read that, at first glance it applies only to 24 and 33 into it?
It says "Southbound aircraft cross DKK VORTAC at or abouve 2300." That
sentence doesn't say anything about which runway.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
KCNH departure procedure. Roy Smith Instrument Flight Rules 5 August 24th 04 10:52 PM
Notes on NACO Obstacle Departure Procedures John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 1 July 15th 04 10:20 PM
Procedure Turn Bravo8500 Instrument Flight Rules 65 April 22nd 04 03:27 AM
Interesting Departure Procedu MRB Trixy Two Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 26 February 18th 04 11:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.