If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"G. Sylvester" wrote:
Fly to the next fix even if it is behind you and then continue on as filed. Other than an initial departure heading (i.e. "fly runway heading", or something like that), I'm having trouble thinking of a situation where the next fix would be behind you. If they've already vectored you past a fix in your initial clearance, I'd skip it and go to the next one. But, like I've said before, it's easy to sit here on my comfy living room couch and hypothesize about what the right thing to do is. When it happens to you, you'll be in the best position to figure out what makes the most sense given the situation. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"G. Sylvester" wrote in message m... correct. if they say "vectors for traffic" and you lose comm, squawk 7600 and then fly direct to your next fix as that is your clearance. if they say "fly heading 060" (but not for traffic), it is to intercept an approach course or victor/jet airway but it is for something. If they are just handing out vectors to nowhere just to vector you around the Class B, well do as they say in thee book. Do as cleared (but with no further explanation) - expected (they didn't say anything) - filed. Fly to the next fix even if it is behind you and then continue on as filed. If they ask you then they can also listen to the tapes and they should 'expect' a better clearance from their controllers. How can the next fix be behind you? Are you thinking of a situation where the vectors have turned you completely around? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The last time I flew through the Cleveland Class B I was IMC eastbound
via DJB to Youngstown. I got vectored out over Lake Erie before I got to Dryer, so in that sense my "next fix" would be "behind me". But I can't imagine why would go back to DJB, which is southwest of Hopkins. My inclination would be to stay with the vector for another 5-10 minutes, until I could make a single turn and overfly Burke airport on the assumption that that would keep me at least out of Burke traffic and then direct YNG. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
paul kgyy wrote:
The last time I flew through the Cleveland Class B I was IMC eastbound via DJB to Youngstown. I got vectored out over Lake Erie before I got to Dryer, so in that sense my "next fix" would be "behind me". exactly. Flying out of SQL, you get RV OAK V244 ECA. Basically they vector you onto V244. Often they just given you a heading to fly right after departure with no additional "expect V244." So you are still on RV to OAK. Often they say "fly heading XXX and intercept V244" after you are already past OAK. Technically you are still be in RV to OAK and therefore should fly it. In practice this might one of those situations where you are 3nm to V244 vs. 10 to OAK. They would probably expect you to go to V244 rather than fly the 20 nm round trip back to your initial lost comm point. This is kind of like holding until your filed enroute time /arrival time. If you hold you tie up all the airspace so even though they say hold all controllers say "just land ASAP." Gerald |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "Lynne" wrote in message oups.com... Makes sense. However, every vector must be for somewhere. IE: "Gulfstream zero golf alpha, turn left heading 250 vectors for traffic, you can expect direct choo choo" If you are not given a location where the vector is for, it's fully appropriate to ask the controller for one. Every vector must be for someTHING, not necessarily someWHERE. When initiating a vector the controller must advise the pilot of the purpose. The vector may me for traffic or for spacing. Flying into the LA basin many years ago talking to SoCal Appch to Orange County Apt I was vectored for about half an hour before I got vectors to fly the approach. It was not clear what really was going on (most of it was in IMC) or where I was going until the final approach clearance. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Florida Mil and NASA Comms Log - Tues, 18 May 2004 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 4 | July 10th 04 02:00 AM |
Florida Military Comms Log - Thurs 15 Apr 2004 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 1 | April 17th 04 08:38 PM |
Q about lost comms on weird clearance | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 34 | February 2nd 04 09:11 PM |
Lost comms after radar vector | Mike Ciholas | Instrument Flight Rules | 119 | January 31st 04 11:39 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |