A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 16th 03, 06:27 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This is my understanding too. In order for the box to drive the glideslope
needle, the altitudes have to be in the database. Currently I don't think
that they are..

Mike
MU-2


"Scott Moore" wrote in message
...
Richard Kaplan wrote:

"Scott Moore" wrote in message
...
Speaking only for myself, its pretty damm confusing exactly what would

be
done with WAAS even if implemented. Garmins' other units that accept


WAAS is now implemented and IFR approved as of the past week.

If a receiver were approved for WAAS approaches, then TODAY you could

use
VNAV/LNAV miniums on GPS RNAV approaches instead of LNAV minimums.
Presumably (though I am not certain) a VNAV/LNAV GPS RNAV approach would

be
considered a precision approach. UPSAT's CNX80 web page touts the

airports
you have access to today with WAAS; yet the version of the POH

supplement
posted on their site says in the legal fineprint that precision

approaches
are NOT permitted. So I am not certain if you can or cannot fly

VNAV/LNAV
GPS approach mininums TODAY on a CNX-80.

What I would like to see from Garmin is a controlled descent option
on non-precision GPS approaches, which would be perfectly legal to
implement right now (because it is inside the "dive and drive"


If you want to do this as a backup to other navigation, you can do this

now
with the VNAV function on the Garmin 430/530, albeit not yet with WAAS.


I was talking about driving the glideslope needle. Pretty much by

definition,
WAAS is going to have to drive the needle to be a precision device. On my

430,
the glideslope needle is driven (obviously) by the box, and when Garmin

talks
about "WAAS compatibility" I have to presume that it means ability to

drive
the glideslope from the GPS side. What else would it mean ? We can add

boxes
to make WAAS work ? Anybody could say that.

--
For most men, true happiness can only be achieved with a woman.
Also for most men, true happiness can only be achieved without a woman.
Sharp minds have noted that these two rules tend to conflict.....



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.