![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() This way the JJs and newbies could finish at their desired 500' (or more), and proceed liesurely to the pattern, while us crazed maniacs could risk life and limb to shine our a**es for the crowd of adoring groupies via spectacular beat-ups. Heck, JJ, we'll probably kill ourselves off pretty quickly (along with assorted burning worms) so your problem will be solved! Do I hear a knucke-draggin' Neanderthal outside the cave? Wanten' to know if old JJ can come out and play? You're a figher jock, Kirt, tell me something; Would you rather drive over the target and drop an irom bomb on it or toss a GPS guided hummer at it? I for one, have had enough of that "drivin'-over-the-target" business and I'm happy we can now accomplish the same mission by simply dialing in the GPS coordinates and fling that clever little thing at the target from a mile away. ;) JJ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JJ, you've got the wrong comparison!
Would you rather bring your four-ship down initial and pitch out into a nice tight pattern, rolling out of your final turn just as you touch down, where everybody can see it and appreciate the beauty of it, or skulk back via an ASLAR, dragging your wingmen and creeping in the last ten miles with the gear down at 170 knots. Yeah, that's manly! Racing is about fun, dropping HE is a job - and I'm all for giving every swinging richard a load of GBU-38s and a long list of very special coordinates and turning them loose. Just remember to keep the targeting pod on the impact point so you can get some good CNN video... Kirk (that's with 2 K's) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Morning Kirk (with 2 K's) When I was a staff puke at Langley (DOE) we worked a proposal to stop doing the overhead, pitch-out pattern because of safety considerations. The conclusion was it should be retained because it was the fastest way to get 4 ships back on the ground. It's also very enjoyable to watch. The finish gate is very enjoyable to watch, but whers the need? Why, we don't even have a guy down there with a stop watch any more. It's all for show. We've beat this thing to death, lets go fly, JJ (with 2 J's) wrote: JJ, you've got the wrong comparison! Would you rather bring your four-ship down initial and pitch out into a nice tight pattern, rolling out of your final turn just as you touch down, where everybody can see it and appreciate the beauty of it, or skulk back via an ASLAR, dragging your wingmen and creeping in the last ten miles with the gear down at 170 knots. Yeah, that's manly! Racing is about fun, dropping HE is a job - and I'm all for giving every swinging richard a load of GBU-38s and a long list of very special coordinates and turning them loose. Just remember to keep the targeting pod on the impact point so you can get some good CNN video... Kirk (that's with 2 K's) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You got it, good buddy, let's go aviate!
Outside, Cu's everywhere. Unfortunately, the sims I fly all seem to have bad inversions in them. Kirk (The need, by the way, is to lift the soul!) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finish Gate Accident no. 2 | [email protected] | Soaring | 50 | April 2nd 05 06:58 AM |
Visulalizing the Finish Cylinder | [email protected] | Soaring | 44 | March 25th 05 02:10 PM |
Why does the Sporting code require "Goal" to be a finish point??? | Mark Zivley | Soaring | 31 | October 18th 04 10:31 PM |
Carbon Fiber - Achieving Glossy Finish w/o GelCoat | RKT | Home Built | 7 | March 8th 04 06:15 AM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |