A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Finish lines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 7th 05, 02:05 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



This way the JJs and newbies could finish at their desired 500' (or
more), and proceed liesurely to the pattern, while us crazed maniacs
could risk life and limb to shine our a**es for the crowd of adoring
groupies via spectacular beat-ups.


Heck, JJ, we'll probably kill ourselves off pretty quickly (along

with
assorted burning worms) so your problem will be solved!


Do I hear a knucke-draggin' Neanderthal outside the cave? Wanten' to
know if old JJ can come out and play? You're a figher jock, Kirt, tell
me something; Would you rather drive over the target and drop an irom
bomb on it or toss a GPS guided hummer at it?

I for one, have had enough of that "drivin'-over-the-target" business
and I'm happy we can now accomplish the same mission by simply dialing
in the GPS coordinates and fling that clever little thing at the target
from a mile away.
;) JJ

  #2  
Old May 9th 05, 02:25 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

JJ, you've got the wrong comparison!

Would you rather bring your four-ship down initial and pitch out into a
nice tight pattern, rolling out of your final turn just as you touch
down, where everybody can see it and appreciate the beauty of it, or
skulk back via an ASLAR, dragging your wingmen and creeping in the last
ten miles with the gear down at 170 knots. Yeah, that's manly!

Racing is about fun, dropping HE is a job - and I'm all for giving
every swinging richard a load of GBU-38s and a long list of very
special coordinates and turning them loose.

Just remember to keep the targeting pod on the impact point so you can
get some good CNN video...

Kirk (that's with 2 K's)

  #3  
Old May 9th 05, 02:31 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Morning Kirk (with 2 K's)
When I was a staff puke at Langley (DOE) we worked a proposal to stop
doing the overhead, pitch-out pattern because of safety considerations.
The conclusion was it should be retained because it was the fastest way
to get 4 ships back on the ground. It's also very enjoyable to watch.

The finish gate is very enjoyable to watch, but whers the need? Why, we
don't even have a guy down there with a stop watch any more. It's all
for show.

We've beat this thing to death, lets go fly,
JJ (with 2 J's)

wrote:
JJ, you've got the wrong comparison!

Would you rather bring your four-ship down initial and pitch out into

a
nice tight pattern, rolling out of your final turn just as you touch
down, where everybody can see it and appreciate the beauty of it, or
skulk back via an ASLAR, dragging your wingmen and creeping in the

last
ten miles with the gear down at 170 knots. Yeah, that's manly!

Racing is about fun, dropping HE is a job - and I'm all for giving
every swinging richard a load of GBU-38s and a long list of very
special coordinates and turning them loose.

Just remember to keep the targeting pod on the impact point so you

can
get some good CNN video...

Kirk (that's with 2 K's)


  #4  
Old May 9th 05, 06:54 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You got it, good buddy, let's go aviate!

Outside, Cu's everywhere. Unfortunately, the sims I fly all seem to
have bad inversions in them.

Kirk

(The need, by the way, is to lift the soul!)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finish Gate Accident no. 2 [email protected] Soaring 50 April 2nd 05 06:58 AM
Visulalizing the Finish Cylinder [email protected] Soaring 44 March 25th 05 02:10 PM
Why does the Sporting code require "Goal" to be a finish point??? Mark Zivley Soaring 31 October 18th 04 10:31 PM
Carbon Fiber - Achieving Glossy Finish w/o GelCoat RKT Home Built 7 March 8th 04 06:15 AM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.