A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Engine Desing



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 11th 05, 08:20 PM
Sport Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Harley is not made to be smooth. Both pistons connect to the same
crankpin and fire right after each other. This is part of the famous
Harley lope as the engine goes bang bang flup flup.

  #2  
Old May 12th 05, 12:19 AM
Cy Galley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't believe so. Since it is a FOUR cycle engine, Each cylinder only
fires every other revolution. It is timed so that one cylinder fires each
revolution. They alternate but since they are staggered, so is the timing.


"Sport Pilot" wrote in message
oups.com...
The Harley is not made to be smooth. Both pistons connect to the same
crankpin and fire right after each other. This is part of the famous
Harley lope as the engine goes bang bang flup flup.



  #3  
Old May 12th 05, 05:35 PM
Sport Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Both pistions are on the same crankpin at a 45 degree angle, they share
the same camshaft and lobes. One one revelution both cylinders fire
and on the next revolution they are on the exhaust and intake stroke.
Bang Bang ...... Flup Flup. Listen to the engine next time you are
sitting next to a Harley at a stop light. It is very obvious.

  #4  
Old May 12th 05, 05:07 PM
Corky Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 11 May 2005 23:19:25 GMT, "Cy Galley"
wrote:

I don't believe so. Since it is a FOUR cycle engine, Each cylinder only
fires every other revolution. It is timed so that one cylinder fires each
revolution. They alternate but since they are staggered, so is the timing.


Cy, I think they really do go bang bang, flup flup because of the
angle of the V. They cannot be timed so that they can fire as equally
opposite as a horizonatally opposed twin.

Harley actually attempted to patten the sound against Japanese copies.
They called it: potato potato potato potato and said it was theirs and
theirs only. Think they lost that fight.

Corky Scott

  #5  
Old May 12th 05, 06:52 PM
Sport Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Harley actually attempted to patten the sound against Japanese copies.

They called it: potato potato potato potato and said it was theirs and


theirs only. Think they lost that fight.


HuH? Harleys were built that way in the 19 naughts! This was done to
save weight. Unlike you the engineers back then knew that you could
provide two crankpins and have one cylinder fire every 360 degrees at
what ever angle they chose. The 45 degree angle is simply to get the
engine into a small space as possible in the frame.

It was the Japanese who copied Harley. Maybe Harley tried to sue them,
but most Japenese v twins use ofset crank pins for a smoother run.
Also the cylinders are more ofset to improve cooling.

  #6  
Old May 12th 05, 09:27 PM
Corky Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 12 May 2005 10:52:25 -0700, "Sport Pilot"
wrote:

HuH? Harleys were built that way in the 19 naughts! This was done to
save weight. Unlike you the engineers back then knew that you could
provide two crankpins and have one cylinder fire every 360 degrees at
what ever angle they chose. The 45 degree angle is simply to get the
engine into a small space as possible in the frame.


I should have known that, after all I just got finished putting
together my Ford V-6 which is a 90 degree bank angle V-6. It has
displaced crankpins to allow for even firing.

Corky Scott
  #7  
Old May 22nd 05, 10:29 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Harley Davidson engine is a copy of the 1898 or so De Dion-Bouton.
HD didn't originate it, and there is no way in hell they can keep
anyone else from building a v-twin engine. They lost their essential
point.

Offsetting the cylinders gives you a "rocking couple". But since the
Japanese imitation Harleys are for people who want approximate Harley
appearance and are mechanical idiots....

  #9  
Old May 13th 05, 12:27 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Corky Scott wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005 23:19:25 GMT, "Cy Galley"
wrote:

I don't believe so. Since it is a FOUR cycle engine, Each cylinder

only
fires every other revolution. It is timed so that one cylinder

fires each
revolution. They alternate but since they are staggered, so is the

timing.

Cy, I think they really do go bang bang, flup flup because of the
angle of the V. They cannot be timed so that they can fire as

equally
opposite as a horizonatally opposed twin.

Harley actually attempted to patten the sound against Japanese

copies.
They called it: potato potato potato potato and said it was theirs

and
theirs only. Think they lost that fight.


IIRC they claimed trademark protection, not patent.

And they won.

My girlfriend says Harley's sound sexy. Now you know why.

--

FF

  #10  
Old May 13th 05, 01:10 AM
Bob Kuykendall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Earlier, wrote:

IIRC they claimed trademark protection, not patent.

And they won.


Trademark instad of patent, yes. But as for winning, Unka Cecil tells
it different:

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/000915.html

...The Japanese put it more diplomatically when
fighting Harley's trademark request, arguing
that all big motorcycles sound pretty much the
same. After six years of legal proceedings and
no resolution in sight, Harley caved, claiming
it had won in the court of public opinion,
etc...


This SF Chronicle article says that they dropped the trademark attempt
in 2000:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...618EDT0176.DTL

Thanks, and best regards to all

Bob K.
http://www.hpaircraft.com

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ROP masking of engine problems Roger Long Piloting 1 September 25th 04 07:13 PM
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I Robert Clark Military Aviation 2 May 26th 04 06:42 PM
Autorotation ? R22 for the Experts Eric D Rotorcraft 22 March 5th 04 06:11 AM
Real stats on engine failures? Captain Wubba Piloting 127 December 8th 03 04:09 PM
Corky's engine choice Corky Scott Home Built 39 August 8th 03 04:29 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.