![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jack Cunniff" wrote in message
... Found at: http://www2.faa.gov/avr/afs/afs800/docs/pt61FAQ.doc contains this: QUESTION: As far as logging an approach in actual, is there any requirement (i.e. must it be in actual conditions beyond the final approach fix)? Assume that the pilot was flying single-pilot IFR so he couldn't simply put on the hood if he broke out? ANSWER: § 61.51(g)(1) and § 61.57(c)(1)(i); Again the only place where it defines logging .instrument flight time. means .. . . a person may log instrument time only for that flight time when the person operates the aircraft solely by reference to instruments . . . .. As for logging an .actual. approach, it would presume the approach to be to the conclusion of the approach which would mean the pilot go down to the decision height or to the minimum decent altitude, as appropriate. If what you.re asking is whether it is okay to fly to the FAF and break it off and then log it as accomplishing an approach, the answer is no. {Q&A-291} ----------- There you have it. It -seems- like the only loggable approach is one that is in IMC or under a hood until DH or MDA. I had thought that was what John Lynch meant, but now I read this extract again I'm not so sure. What he actually says is that you fly all the way to the conclusion of the approach, not that you fly to the conclusion in IMC. His reference to "fly to the FAF and break it off" seems gratuitous otherwise. I don't think anyone is actually asking that, so he may be, in his mind, answering a slightly different question. -- David Brooks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Brooks" wrote in message
I had thought that was what John Lynch meant, but now I read this extract again I'm not so sure. What he actually says is that you fly all the way to the conclusion of the approach, not that you fly to the conclusion in IMC. His reference to "fly to the FAF and break it off" seems gratuitous otherwise. I don't think anyone is actually asking that, so he may be, in his mind, answering a slightly different question. The question he's answering is not whether the approach can be logged at all, but whether it can be logged as an approach in actual conditions (see the phrase ["actual" approach]). -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/tknoFlyer _______________ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Logging instrument approaches | Slav Inger | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | July 27th 03 11:00 PM |
Suppose We Really Do Have Only GPS Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 20th 03 05:10 PM |
Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |
NDB approaches -- what are they good for? | Dylan Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | July 10th 03 09:15 PM |