A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

IFR Alternate Requirement



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 12th 05, 03:14 PM
gregscheetah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why are you trying to get out of filing an alternate? Is there some
reason that this is difficult to do for you?

I would suggest that you always file an alternate and forget about
having to memorize when, where, why and how. Much easier and
eventually may save you some confusing during a time of quick decision
making.

Greg


Roy Smith wrote:

So, it seems like I could file "HPN -D- BDR D/010 -D- BOS",
i.e. "White Plains, direct Bridgeport, ten minute delay (not sure if

I
got the flight plan symbol right for that), direct Boston" and as

long
as BDR doesn't doesn't require an alternate, I don't have to file one
for the BOS leg either, since BDR is my "first airport of intended
landing".


  #2  
Old May 12th 05, 06:48 PM
Stan Gosnell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"gregscheetah" wrote in
ups.com:

Why are you trying to get out of filing an alternate? Is there some
reason that this is difficult to do for you?

I would suggest that you always file an alternate and forget about
having to memorize when, where, why and how. Much easier and
eventually may save you some confusing during a time of quick decision
making.


Filing an alternate shouldn't have any effect on your decision making at
the destination. Alternate requirements are for fuel planning only. As
soon as you take off, the alternate you filed becomes immaterial. ATC
doesn't know what alternate you filed, or if you filed one. When you get
to your destination and miss, then you need to make a decision on where
to go. You should have been keeping up on the weather at your
destination, your alternate, and other possible diversions. The
alternate you filed may not be the best place to go, for both weather and
personal convenience. Once you miss and decide to go somewhere else,
you're free to go anywhere you have the fuel to get to, and ATC will ask
you your intentions when you miss, having no idea where you want to go.
You now have to decide. If you want to blindly go to your filed
alternate without even thinking any further, you can, but make sure you
check the current weather first. I often file an alternate with no
intention whatsoever of ever going there.

--
Regards,

Stan

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin
  #3  
Old May 13th 05, 02:47 PM
MJC
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Pilots do too many stupid things already that get themselves killed.
Requiring an alternate is nothing more than a simple attempt to make pilots
do something that they should plan for anyway. Even when I file an
alternate, I always like to have plates for another "personal" alternate so
that I have one more choice if weather goes bad at my destination.
I don't see why this reg should bother anyone enough to even bring it up
for discussion.

MJC

"Stan Gosnell" wrote in message
...
"gregscheetah" wrote in
ups.com:

Why are you trying to get out of filing an alternate? Is there some
reason that this is difficult to do for you?

I would suggest that you always file an alternate and forget about
having to memorize when, where, why and how. Much easier and
eventually may save you some confusing during a time of quick decision
making.


Filing an alternate shouldn't have any effect on your decision making at
the destination. Alternate requirements are for fuel planning only. As
soon as you take off, the alternate you filed becomes immaterial. ATC
doesn't know what alternate you filed, or if you filed one. When you get
to your destination and miss, then you need to make a decision on where
to go. You should have been keeping up on the weather at your
destination, your alternate, and other possible diversions. The
alternate you filed may not be the best place to go, for both weather and
personal convenience. Once you miss and decide to go somewhere else,
you're free to go anywhere you have the fuel to get to, and ATC will ask
you your intentions when you miss, having no idea where you want to go.
You now have to decide. If you want to blindly go to your filed
alternate without even thinking any further, you can, but make sure you
check the current weather first. I often file an alternate with no
intention whatsoever of ever going there.

--
Regards,

Stan

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin



  #4  
Old May 13th 05, 04:28 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 13 May 2005 08:47:48 -0500, "MJC" wrote:

I always like to have plates for another "personal" alternate so
that I have one more choice if weather goes bad at my destination.



You don't need plates to have another choice.

If need be, ask ATC to read the approach. I'm not suggesting a
cavalier attitude about having plates, but no one should ever choose
to accept a less desirable alternative because plates are not
available, for whatever reason. ATC has all the information necessary
to follow an approach procedure, and they will provide it to you if
required.
  #6  
Old May 13th 05, 08:14 PM
Antoņio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

gregscheetah wrote:
Why are you trying to get out of filing an alternate? Is there some
reason that this is difficult to do for you?

I would suggest that you always file an alternate and forget about
having to memorize when, where, why and how. Much easier and
eventually may save you some confusing during a time of quick decision
making.

Greg


I can see a couple reasons why one would not wish to file an alternate.
If I recall correctly, you must have enough fuel to fly to the alternate
and then 45 minutes beyond. If the alternate is say, 30 minutes away,
that would require an extra hour and 15 minutes of fuel. This could
affect weight and balance calculations and maybe the necessity to plan
an extra fuel stop.

Antonio

  #7  
Old May 13th 05, 08:29 PM
MJC
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Antoņio" wrote in message
...
gregscheetah wrote:
Why are you trying to get out of filing an alternate? Is there some
reason that this is difficult to do for you?

I would suggest that you always file an alternate and forget about
having to memorize when, where, why and how. Much easier and
eventually may save you some confusing during a time of quick decision
making.

Greg


I can see a couple reasons why one would not wish to file an alternate.
If I recall correctly, you must have enough fuel to fly to the alternate
and then 45 minutes beyond. If the alternate is say, 30 minutes away,
that would require an extra hour and 15 minutes of fuel. This could
affect weight and balance calculations and maybe the necessity to plan
an extra fuel stop.

Antonio


Your plan, then, if you can't make your intended destination if you couldn't
even make your best alternate (that you don't want to file for)?

MJC


  #8  
Old May 14th 05, 02:05 AM
Antoņio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

MJC wrote:

Your plan, then, if you can't make your intended destination if you couldn't
even make your best alternate (that you don't want to file for)?

MJC


A few theoretical answers...

1. You might be able to make an alternate that would not qualify,
strictly speaking, under the rules as an alternate...say a private turf
airport 1 mile away from the intended destination. To file an alternate
that *would* qualify would require extra fuel that may not be desirable
or even necessary.

2. It might be CAVU everywhere in the world and you do not see the point
to filing an alternate that would require carrying the extra fuel and
doing the extra planning.

3.I might file an alternate, then decide to use some other alternate
which wasn't planned for. However, the fuel requirements to get to the
filed alternate and 45 minutes beyond would still be in effect.

4.I might be in a helicopter and not realistically need an alternate.

5.I might be in a float plane and use some known lake as a backup.


I hope you realize that all the above is just theoretical with a partial
tongue in cheek. Personally, I always file a legal alternate. I just
thought there might be situations where, for whatever reason, one might
not wish to.


Antonio


  #9  
Old May 14th 05, 10:02 PM
Stan Gosnell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Antoņio wrote in
:

4.I might be in a helicopter and not realistically need an alternate.


Helicopters have the same alternate requirements as fixed-wing, except
that they only require fuel for 30 minutes after the alternate. Lack of
range does mean that a helicopter pilot has to plan very carefully,
though.

--
Regards,

Stan

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alternate minimums same as forecast weather [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 17 February 21st 06 10:45 PM
FBO Insurance requirement for tie-downs Chris Owning 25 May 18th 04 07:24 PM
Alternate Intersection Name in Brackets? Marco Leon Instrument Flight Rules 7 January 22nd 04 04:55 AM
Strange wording in Commercial experience requirement David Brooks Piloting 5 January 18th 04 06:09 PM
Alternate requirements Anthony Chambers Instrument Flight Rules 8 September 17th 03 09:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Š2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.