![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() T o d d P a t t i s t wrote: I witnessed a turnback in a similar aircraft that was close enough to be called a partial success. He would have made it with a slightly wider runway, and his alternatives were all much worse. There is a limit at which it can be done successfully, and a limit where it can't. I think it's valuable to know that limit, and I'd already gone through the "what-ifs" at altitude. I knew "pattern altitude" was way too high for the Champ. It was time to try it for real. IMHO, You've got the right idea. The blanket "don't turn back unless you're at pattern altitude" may not always be the best option. It's important to know what you and your plane are capable of doing. As you noted, the best alternative may not include getting back to a runway. At airports that are surrounded by densely populated suburbs, often the best place to be is somewhere in the airport environment that is relative free of obstructions like houses and schools. If you can make it back this area, you may be better off even if you can't make a runway. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Long flight today... | Steve R. | Rotorcraft | 1 | October 21st 04 11:16 PM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Weather vs. Combat | Gordon | Military Aviation | 38 | September 23rd 03 04:11 PM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |