![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Paul wrote:
"Mike the Strike" wrote in message oups.com... I know of at least one non-ham who carries a 2-meter radio for emergency use also. Are you encouraging non-licensed use of ham repeaters? Don't most repeaters today require a specific sub-audio tone to key the repeater? Isn't the reason for the tones to eliminate unlicensed operators? I have an old Heath Kit hand held 2 meter unit that is almost useless because it doesn't have sub-audio capabilities. I took my old hand held to Mackay, Idaho this summer and realized that it couldn't key any relevant repeaters. I think most repeaters that are using PL/DPL (CTCSS/DCS) are doing so in an effort to better reject interference. Especially in urban areas the repeater receivers may tend to hear a lot of inadvertant activity either because of intermodulation or good propogation or just strong signals. Generally speaking if the repeater is operating in this mode, the particular tone is published by the ARRL (at least in the US) and probably broadcast by the repeater when it identifies itself. Any modern transmitter has subaudio capability so I don't see how this would prevent unlicensed, and intentional interference. PL/DPL is, and has always been a means of cooperatively sharing resources. In the US, most of the barriers to get a Amateur Radio license have been removed. Go to Radio Shack get a current license guide read it and take the test for the "no-code" license class. Any glider pilot should be able to pass the test with one weekend worth of study. I agree with this one completely. There's no reason any pilot should have trouble passing a no-code tech exam on 1 weekend's worth of studying. I think its only about 50 questions, multiple choice, with published questions and answers. I see no legitamite reason to use an amateur radio unlicensed. The act of purchasing it essentially implies that you intend at some point to use it. So even if its an emergency at the moment, it wasn't an emergency during the one year between when you bought it and used it during which time there's no reason you couldn't have gone out and gotten a license. dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Portable radio scanners | Casey Wilson | Piloting | 1 | August 1st 05 02:05 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
Portable XM Radio receiver in the cockpit? | Peter R. | Piloting | 13 | September 4th 04 03:46 AM |
Ham Radio In The Airplane | Cy Galley | Owning | 23 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |