![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
pgbnh wrote: It is common wisdom, and often common sense, that if a full deflection of a CDI (or GS) is experienced, a missed approach is to be flown. But a lot of people seem to think that it is REQUIRED. I have had a CFII tell me it is required. But I can not find anything in FAR or AIM that states such a requirement. Again, in a lot of cases I can understand why to do it. But I can also imagine others where it might make just as much sense to recover the approach and not go missed. Can anyone point me at a rule that requires a missed? The rule is implied. The procedure is an FAR. If the needles are fully deflected you are no longer flying the courses or altitudes specified in the procedure. Thus, if you don't miss you are continuing the procedure without following the requirements set forth on the approach chart. The feds won't bust you for violating Part 97, though, they'll bust you for careless and reckless. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 04:54 AM |
| Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 03:37 AM |
| Why an NDB approach with a miss to an intersection? | Ben Jackson | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | March 25th 04 04:53 AM |
| Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 06:22 PM |
| IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 10:03 PM |