![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... Another of my pet peeves is when a business extends different prices to different customers. It's called volume discount. "Every man deserves a square deal" Theodore Roosevelt Speaking of government costs out of control, there's the guy who started much of it (the American Empire). |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Abafon Goula" wrote in message ... On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 10:12:54 -0800, Jeff wrote: Well the elections are comming up, if you think things are getting bad now, wait untill GW gets re-elected (if he does), then he has no reason to not hold back since he would be on his last term. Let's kick his dumb ass out! Might be nice to have a president that has at least half a brain and not a puppet. Unfortunately there will only be a few choices and Teddy Roosevelt is not running this year. A major problem is that the candidates in the election had to win the primaries. It is difficult to win the Democratic primary without being a big government, tax and spend, bleeding heart. It is difficult to win the Republican primary without being a big government, borrow and spend, friend of big polluting business and the religious right. Looks like, no matter who wins, we will have a big government with Santa Claus at its head. Of course the real Santa Clause brought presents to everybody and government Santa Clauses favor their constituencies. Basically each generation is trying to steal from the next. The retired try to steal from the working by demanding medical and retirement benefits vastly greater than any taxes that they paid to fund them. The working in turn try to steal from future generations by running a deficit in good times and bad. The future generations have had nobody since TR to advance their cause. Mike MU-2 |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would argue that national parks and medical R&D are National issues and as
such should be funded at the National level. An artifical rain forest in Iowa is clearly not a National issue Mike MU-2 "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message news ![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... I guess they need to distinguish what we care about from what we want! Pork spending is getting out of hand but I don't see any mechanism to contain it. Even the defense budget is about 25% pork according to one study I read (I think it was by the CBO or GAO). In 1981-82 the Grace Commission found that 40% or more of government spending was pork/waste. But hey, this is a DEMOCRACY. The spending might not be what YOU want (you probably have your own little pet project -- we all do), but it's what your NEIGHBOR wants. "What we must remember is that, in a democracy, the whores are us." - P.J. O'Rourke, _Parliament of Whores_. I agree completely. Everybody wants lots of things if they don't have to pay for them. The federal government should stick to national issues, defense, foriegn relations, interstate commerce, national parks, some research ect. See, even that last couple are outside the vail of the Constitution. EVERYBODY and I mean EVERYBODY has some pet project the want the feds to perform outside their assigned duties. You want Parks and R&D. Someone else wants health care. Another wants cheap gas. That's where it goes haywire. The state governments should stick to state issues, state highways, law enforcement and so on. Local projects should be funded locally. If Anaheim needs a railway to Disneyland which is only going to benefit Anaheim hotels, I don't see why someone in New York should pay for it. Why should TAXPAYERS in ANY locale pay for a private companies infrastructure? All pork spending is a result of people wanting things they don't have to pay for. I don't have any pet projects that I expect someone else to pay for. You mentioned two above. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt
Mike MU-2 "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Abafon Goula" wrote in message ... On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 10:12:54 -0800, Jeff wrote: Well the elections are comming up, if you think things are getting bad now, wait untill GW gets re-elected (if he does), then he has no reason to not hold back since he would be on his last term. Let's kick his dumb ass out! Might be nice to have a president that has at least half a brain and not a puppet. And which one from the past 150 years or more, would fit that description? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net... I would argue that national parks and medical R&D are National issues and as such should be funded at the National level. An artifical rain forest in Iowa is clearly not a National issue Here is another national issue that needs some funding: Our sick dependance on foreign oil that funds the very terrorists that seek to destroy us. And I'm not talking about some wacky unworkable idea for hydrogen fuel in 20 or 30 years. Where is the backbone of real leadership? No. Our so-called leaders wish to spend us into oblivion instead. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds similar to my policy(ies). Some companies lost a good customer,
and some have really impressed me. "Haywood Jablome" wrote in message news:k6hTb.207931$na.340391@attbi_s04... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message news:JVgTb.81 The difference between me and you is that I could not be bothered to play that game. So I let my subscription slide years ago. So now they get nothing and I am spared of the bull****. In the "old days", companies used to "nickel and dime", you to death. Today, it's $50 and $100 you to death. Not a month goes by I don't find someone trying to slip and extra $10, $20, $50...past us on a billing statement. Of course, the "error" is never in MY favor. :~( I'm on a screw you diet. The rules are simple: 1. If the price is fair, I will pay it. You do not waste my time with negotiations. 2. If there is a problem with your product, I give you one chance to fix it. If you cannot fix it satisfactorily and fast the first time, I will return it for a refund. 3. If I have to wait more than 10 minutes maximum to talk to your tech support on the phone then I will take my business elsewhere. 4. I do not stand and wait in any queue for more than 4 minutes. After which time I leave the goods exactly where they are and walk out of the store (losers on welfare have an excuse to wait in line) 5. If you have me between a rock and a hard place - tardy contractors are an example - I will harrass you by telephone at your home and/or business at least 4 times a day until you make good. Try it. It works. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rapoport" wrote:
' I'm not sure exactly what gainI'll be missing. Every spring there are articles in every aviation mag about flying when there is convective weather. After flying a few years and being exposed to 100 such articles admonishing us not to fly into a thunderstorm, what is gained be reading one more? I dunno, Mike - I think IFR is a cut above most of that stuff. I'm sure I've found more real-world, useful stuff there than in the other mags. It's funny, too. Belvoir's subscription dept. irritates me, too, but not enough to dump IFR. -- Dan C172RG at BFM (remove pants to reply by email) |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had a similar problem with Flying Magazine. My wife got me a subscription
over the web. After it ran out, they started calling us on the phone to try to get us to renew. We told them over and over to put our number on their do not call list, threatened them, whatever, but the calls kept coming in. I sent a letter to Flying Magazine and got a letter of apology, but they claimed they couldn't do much about it because it was a separate marketing company or whatever. Needless to say, I stopped the subscription. I really liked IFR magazine originally. Seems like they had some good info that filled in the cracks other magazines left. I still go back and re-read some of the old issues. But after a few years, it seems to be getting somewhat redundant. I was always dismayed at how much it cost. They need a few more advertisers to bring the cost down. .... Aaron "Abafon Goula" wrote in message ... On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:58:25 GMT, "JFee" wrote: I was upset about the same thing. Last year I joined for $24 and this year they sent me renewal notice for $40! So I crossed off the $40 on the renewal notice, wrote in $24 with a short note that if they charged me the same rate I subscribed at, I would renew. Sure enough, they sent me a bill for only $24, and I kept receiving the magazine (though i hesitate to call it that.. more of a newsletter, I think) That's funny! I decided to see if they improved a while back and subscribed. True to form, they started sending me renewal notices before I received my first issue. After the fourth notice, I told them to cram it. "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message nk.net... I used to subscribe to IFR until I realized that they offered a much better rate to new subscribers than to existing ones. After realizing this, my four year old decided to subscribe :-). Today he recieved a solicitation from another aviation magazine. Obviously they sold his (and my) name and address. I always check the little box indicating that I don't want my information shared and I don't want to recieve any offers. I will never subscribe to any Belvoire publication again. Just had to vent after calling a credit card company and telling them not to send me any more ot their stupid balance tranfer checks. It was the third time I called them. I am in the national opt out list for all pre-approved credit and I still get at least two "offers" a day. I guess that Congress is so busy spending our hard earned money developing rainforests in Iowa and subsidized rail to Disneyland that they don't have time for legislation that ordinary people really care about. Mike MU-2 |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message nk.net... Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt You could not have named two that did more to let the "cat outta the bag". Well, no, they weren't puppets, but they sure liked to pull the strings. It's a quetion who money was worse, J. Davis' Confederate money, or Lincoln's "Greenbacks". Lincoln started us on the road to the overarching state, and Teddy gave us the start (and a goodly trip down the road) to the Military-Industrial Complex. Mike MU-2 "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Abafon Goula" wrote in message ... On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 10:12:54 -0800, Jeff wrote: Well the elections are comming up, if you think things are getting bad now, wait untill GW gets re-elected (if he does), then he has no reason to not hold back since he would be on his last term. Let's kick his dumb ass out! Might be nice to have a president that has at least half a brain and not a puppet. And which one from the past 150 years or more, would fit that description? |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... I would argue that national parks and medical R&D are National issues and as such should be funded at the National level. And neither are government issues...state of federal. An artifical rain forest in Iowa is clearly not a National issue Quite! That would be one for Disneyland. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CAAC in China had approved below 116kg aircraft sold in China without airworthiness cetificate | Luo Zheng | Home Built | 0 | June 27th 04 03:50 AM |
Dennis Fetters Mini 500 | EmailMe | Home Built | 70 | June 21st 04 09:36 PM |
Used Avionics | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 40 | December 2nd 03 02:53 PM |
zzz BBob fell asleep at the wheel again zzz was Need Microbalancer | B25flyer | Home Built | 24 | August 29th 03 12:04 PM |
SOLD Becker ATC-4401-175 and SigmaTek ARC EA-401A Servoed Encoding Alt | Juan E Jimenez | Home Built | 0 | August 11th 03 05:03 AM |