![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is not a matter of regulation, of course, and it is not covered in the
AIM...more of a personal preference thing, unless there is a company SOP requiring it. I won't pretend that I have thousands of hours flying jets, but I do have hundreds, and I was never taught to brief those items nor were they included in company SOPs...and we were moving fast enough to make mistakes very costly. Bob Gardner "Ray Andraka" wrote in message ... Doesn't hurt to look real quick at the MSA rings just to get a real rough idea of the underlying terrain. KIPT, for instance has a mountain just to the left of the localizer, and I think you'd want to know that is there if you can't see it. No need to memorize the heights, jsut a rough mental sketch of the minimum safe altitudes is enough. Why? well if something goes wrong at least you know which way not to turn... Bob Gardner wrote: You are cluttering your mind with unnecessary data. If you fly at an assigned altitude or the altitude shown on the plate for a black line, you can forget about the MSA (which is not an operational altitude), the highest obstacle, and maximum safe distance...whatever that is. Frequencies, courses, altitudes, and the miss procedure are enough. Bob Gardner "Peter R." wrote in message ... My approach plate briefing, especially while flying, could use some improvement. I received my instrument rating last March and have about 75 hours of actual IMC time since then, but I honestly feel my briefing of the chart is not as thorough as it must be for optimum situational awareness. I am not just referring to frequencies and approach minimums, but rather the plethora of other information, such as highest nearby obstacle, minimum safe altitude, maximum safe distance ring, etc. Although I try to brief an approach during the lower workload of cruise flight, I discovered that I am still missing some pertinent information. Perhaps I should consider designing a checklist of sorts, but in the mean time I am curious what tips the more seasoned instrument pilots have to offer. Oh, worth mentioning is that I use Jeppesen's approach plates and I do fly in an aircraft equipped with a dual axis AP. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How much protection on approach? | Michael | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | January 15th 04 05:58 PM |
DME req'd on ILS (not ILS-DME) approach? | Don Faulkner | Instrument Flight Rules | 13 | October 7th 03 03:54 AM |
Approach plate | Hankal | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 2nd 03 07:31 PM |
Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |