![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Hansen wrote:
Subsection please. I googled the above and it gave me visual flight rule references 7110.65P, Paragraph 4-6-1 c |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Lieberman wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:36:01 -0800, wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: Subsection please. I googled the above and it gave me visual flight rule references 7110.65P, Paragraph 4-6-1 c Thank you Tim, So, from what I read, if I get from ATC, no delay, then I won't be holding and simply proceeding on to the next fix in my route that I have been cleared to. I won't be required to enter a holding pattern as there is no delay. I will keep sticking to my statement, as I have come across nothing to contradict the fact, if I am put in a hold where I am required to fly in a circle, enter a hold via tear drop, parallel or direct entry, there should be an EFC issued by the air traffic controller. Allen I can think of an example in my area where LA Center uses "paper stop" holds for handoffs to Palm Springs Approach Control because Palm Springs can't see the arrivals on radar due to terrain until they are almost on top of the holding fix. 90% of the time approach control pick up voice and radar in time to cancel the hold. On occasion, things are in the way, and the hold will then be required. Approach control at that time will issue a formal or ad hoc EFC, such as "plan one turn in the hold." And, so it goes. The center can't issue an EFC when it appears there will be no delay. Yet, the paper stop is like a yellow light for a train engineer that was red, so the engineer proceeds slowly but expects it to turn green. Oops, it turns red and he has to start slowing down. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "A Lieberman" wrote in message ... 7110.65P, Paragraph 4-6-1 c Thank you Tim, So, from what I read, if I get from ATC, no delay, then I won't be holding and simply proceeding on to the next fix in my route that I have been cleared to. I won't be required to enter a holding pattern as there is no delay. Right. Apparently you didn't bother to read that subparagraph when I provided the reference a week ago. I will keep sticking to my statement, as I have come across nothing to contradict the fact, if I am put in a hold where I am required to fly in a circle, enter a hold via tear drop, parallel or direct entry, there should be an EFC issued by the air traffic controller. Correct, and to my knowledge nobody has said anything contrary to that in this thread. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Questions from a newbie. | Andrew Tubbiolo | Home Built | 9 | September 14th 04 01:40 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Newbie with questions... | Mike \(Remove X's to reply\) | Piloting | 10 | February 14th 04 01:16 AM |
Newbie questions Rail / Ejector launchers | AL | Military Aviation | 19 | November 14th 03 07:47 PM |
Basic Stupid Newbie Questions... | John Penta | Military Aviation | 5 | September 19th 03 05:23 PM |