|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
April 10th 04, 06:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Brad Z" wrote in message news:qTUdc.3086$_K3.24982@attbi_s53... Bryne is not required to be identified unless you are using the Pittsburgh altimeter setting and need to use it as a stepdown fix. Besides, I've never seen a "VOR required" note on an approach. Anyone else? The note "VOR required" is not used because all IFR aircraft are assumed to have at least one VOR receiver. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 12:13 PM |
| Why an NDB approach with a miss to an intersection? | Ben Jackson | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | March 25th 04 04:53 AM |
| Changes to Aircraft Approach Categories?! | skyliner | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 9th 04 09:55 PM |
| Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 06:20 AM |
| IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 10:03 PM |
Hybrid Mode
