AVIATIONTOOLBOX: I've added your approach plates.

(Ben Jackson) writes:

No, I haven't noticed any. I thought about it earlier, but I'd be
very surprised if the plates could be reasonably georeferenced
anyway. I recall seeing "not to scale" warnings on some of them.

I've just seen screenshots of Jepp's chartview on the MX20 with the
airplane overlayed on the procedure. So Jepp must have their chart
coordinates electronically.

The airport diagrams have nice longitude and latitude lines overlaid
but the approach plates are often a little loose. What would you do
with the squiggly lines by ROGEE here?
http://aviationtoolbox.org/raw_data/.../00001R17L.pdf

I'd trust that Jepp has all of the geo data for their own charts but
I doubt it's a simple thing to add back to the FAA/NOS charts. It
sure would be nice though.

--kyler

The airport diagrams have nice longitude and latitude lines overlaid
but the approach plates are often a little loose. What would you do
with the squiggly lines by ROGEE here?

http://aviationtoolbox.org/raw_data/...-TPP/Published
_pdfs/00001R17L.pdf


I take it to mean that the VOR is not where charted but is in that direction,
just further away.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)

(Teacherjh) writes:


The airport diagrams have nice longitude and latitude lines overlaid
but the approach plates are often a little loose. What would you do
with the squiggly lines by ROGEE here?

http://aviationtoolbox.org/raw_data/...-TPP/Published
_pdfs/00001R17L.pdf


I take it to mean that the VOR is not where charted but is in that direction,
just further away.

Sorry, I assumed people in this group would know that. I should have
been clearer. Yes, that is what the squiggly lines mean.

--kyler