![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in news:1142031981.548827.77600
@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com: I'll give ya a nickel if this doesn't knock your socks off. http://youtube.com/watch?v=vQpVI_aldB0&search=aircraft Am I just goofy, or is there no way to save a copy of this video from the "You Tube" website? What I do is examine my browser cache while the SWF file is loading. It's easy to see which file it is as, if you are doing nothing else online, it's the only fiel getting bigger. Then, just copy it out of the cache and save it as whatever file name you like. I do it all the time. BTW, it also helps if you sort the file listing by most recent files modified first. BTW #2, the browser cache is usually tucked away in a hidden directory. For example, on my NS7.1 on W2k, the path happens to be: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles \default\1kufj97b.slt\Cache Application Data is a hidden directory. I see it because I've set myself up to see ALL friggen' files. ![]() The funky pathname just before Cache will likely be different for every installation. Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Skywise" wrote in message
... What I do is examine my browser cache while the SWF file is loading. It's easy to see which file it is as, if you are doing nothing else online, it's the only fiel getting bigger. Then, just copy it out of the cache and save it as whatever file name you like. I do it all the time. Another way to grab the file is to view the HTML source and find the reference to the file, then create a dummy HTML document with a link to that document (it'll read something like a href="[link]"click here/a, where [link] is replaced by the actual link). In IE, you don't even need a valid HTML header or anything...just put the link, and it'll display correctly. Then you can right-click and use "Save Target As..." to save the file. It's a little messier in that you have to create the dummy HTML document, and of course you have to be willing to find the file link in the original HTML source, but it's easier in the sense that you don't have to go browsing around in your temporary files to find the file itself (which, on my computers anyway, gets to be a pain because of the number of files in the directory). It also doesn't rely on remembering different techniques for different browsers. Any decent browser will have an option to save what a link points to instead of navigating to it. If one does want to simply copy from the temporary files directory, the easiest way in IE to get to the directory is through the Internet Options dialog. Click on the temporary files settings, then the "View Files..." button (in IE7, they've rearranged this a bit, and for some reason the proper button is called "View Trusted Files...", but it does the same thing). The advantage of doing it that way is that Windows Explorer consolidates all your temporary files into a single display window, so you don't have to go looking for the actual temporary files folder in which the file is stored. I haven't looked to see if Firefox has a similar shortcut to the browser cache. It might. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote in
: "Skywise" wrote in message ... What I do is examine my browser cache while the SWF file is loading. It's easy to see which file it is as, if you are doing nothing else online, it's the only fiel getting bigger. Then, just copy it out of the cache and save it as whatever file name you like. I do it all the time. Another way to grab the file is to view the HTML source and find the reference to the file, then create a dummy HTML document with a link to that document (it'll read something like a href="[link]"click here/a, where [link] is replaced by the actual link). In IE, you don't even need a valid HTML header or anything...just put the link, and it'll display correctly. Then you can right-click and use "Save Target As..." to save the file. Snipola Oh yes. I've done that too. I suggest then using my method of cache hunting only when the page source option doesn't work, like when everything is run through java script. Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Skywise" wrote in message
... Oh yes. I've done that too. I suggest then using my method of cache hunting only when the page source option doesn't work, like when everything is run through java script. And for the record, I have found that even when the page is run as Javascript, the actual link to the file is question is still accessible somewhere in the Javascript. Occasionally, it's a relative path, but in that case it's usually easy to determine what it's relative to (usually the main URL for the page). I am always amused when I find a page that has made attempts to obfuscate the original data link. Sometimes it involves disabling right-click as well, or some other clumsy means. But since the content is always in the cache somewhere, the user is always able to get a copy. First (and IMHO only) rule of securing data: any data sent to a potential attacker is impossible to secure. If you want it secured, you need to not send it. Pete |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote in
: Snipola First (and IMHO only) rule of securing data: any data sent to a potential attacker is impossible to secure. If you want it secured, you need to not send it. Agreed. And no need for it to be an "IMHO". It's fact. I have a passing interest in cryptography. Everything I've ever read on the subject states something along those same lines. There is no way to absolutely 100% secure data for transmission. You can come real close, but there's always some way to compromise it. It's just a matter of how determined the 'attacker' is. Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is BOB HOOVER still alive???? | aviation buff | Piloting | 12 | March 21st 17 01:32 PM |
Hoover Dam | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 13 | March 2nd 05 06:20 AM |
Bob Hoover and Chuck Yeager at the Soaring Convention? | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | January 3rd 05 03:49 AM |
Interview with (aviation legend) Bob Hoover | Paul Lips | Owning | 15 | October 10th 04 02:30 PM |
Loss of Doolittle Raider Travis Hoover. | Krztalizer | Military Aviation | 3 | January 21st 04 05:38 AM |