Circle to Land @ KRBG

In a previous article, "Al" said:
At our home field, KRBG, Roseburg, Oregon, we use left traffic for both ends
of our RWY 34-16. The approach procedures cite "Circling east of the rwy
34-16 centerline not authorized". What do I do when I break out, and have
to "circle west of the centerline for RWY 16", while VFR traffic is flying
the normal left traffic(east of centerline) for RWY16?

If there is VFR traffic in the pattern, cancel IFR and join the pattern.

--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
"I find your lack of clue...disturbing" - SithAdmin Vader.

"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...

If there is VFR traffic in the pattern, cancel IFR and join the pattern.


What if that's not permitted?

In a previous article, "Steven P. McNicoll" said:
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...
If there is VFR traffic in the pattern, cancel IFR and join the pattern.
What if that's not permitted?

Forgive my ignorance, but if there is VFR traffic in the pattern, why
would cancelling IFR not be permitted?


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
Frankly, your argument wouldn't float were the sea composed of
mercury.
-- Biff

"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...

Forgive my ignorance, but if there is VFR traffic in the pattern, why
would cancelling IFR not be permitted?


Company policy.

Forgive my ignorance, but if there is VFR traffic in the pattern, why
would cancelling IFR not be permitted?

Ops specs? VFR traffic is illegally flying in what is really IFR
conditions (not likely for a towered airport though)? Funny airspace
(such as the FRZ or DC ADIZ, where cancelling might be problematic,
though it might not be)

Jose
--
The price of freedom is... well... freedom.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

Class G VFR weather minumum during day time is 1sm visibility and clear
of clouds. At KRBG it's actually lower than the instrument approach
minimum.

If IFR all the way to the ground, then the circle to land should be
done according to the restriction of the IAP.