![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Will wrote:
Possibly that data could be colored or made to blink in situations where integrity is compromised sufficiently. It does.. as previously stated... you get a RAIM warning. All you need to know is "is the signal performing to a legal/safe standard" or not. "Good enough for the FAA" is what counts when you are considering the purpose of a GPS guided instrument approach. Adding the percentage parameters you envision is just the sort of thing to add workload to a single pilot IFR approach to minimums. One more thing to monitor.. Instead, I think the Feds got it right.. either its GOOD or its BAD. Period. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garmin backing away from additional GDL-69 features for 430/530 products? | Andrew Gideon | Owning | 2 | September 9th 05 11:36 PM |
Inexpensive Garmin 430/530 question | vlado | Owning | 2 | May 19th 05 03:21 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
WAAS and Garmin 430/530 | DoodyButch | Owning | 23 | October 13th 03 04:06 AM |
Garmin 430/530 Questions | Steve Coleman | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 28th 03 09:04 PM |