|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
June 29th 04, 09:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Louis,
my apologies in case my answer might not be correct - I don't hold an IFR rating. However, my impression of the NACO chart is that the OGJUN fix is not an actual fix but rather a Computer Navigation Fix (CNF) which happens to be named OGJUN on the NACO chart but D040J in the Jeppesen Electronic Databases. This is also indicated by the small 'x' on the NACO chart. So, if R-040/10 DME is indeed a CNF, is it correct that the (NACO) CNF name should not be used in ATC communication? I wonder why the controller used the name OGJUN in his communication then. Consequently, the Jeppesen chart would be correct because there is no official name for this waypoint but only 'electronic' data- base names - which are different between Jeppesen and NACO. Markus 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| how to get NACO online charts conveniently? | Dave Butler | Instrument Flight Rules | 41 | June 16th 04 03:14 PM |
| Can US enroute charts be used in Canada? | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | May 31st 04 09:58 PM |
| Alternative to Jeppesen binders? | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | April 1st 04 09:01 AM |
| Jepp Charts - Subscription Only? | Peter Gibbons | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | November 8th 03 02:01 PM |
| NACO charts - why have a reference circle? | Bob Gardner | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | September 6th 03 01:15 PM |
Hybrid Mode
