![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are going to get a clearance to the airport, no matter what you file.
Filing to an IAF is not necessary, IMHO. Comm failure is an emergency situation, opening the door to doing whatever you want to do under the PIC privilege. Bob Gardner "zatatime" wrote in message ... On 7 Jul 2004 09:53:20 -0700, (Robert M. Gary) wrote: Whenever you are going to a semi-busy airport, don't worry about filing all the way to the IAF, just to the general area. You'll always get vectors anyway. What do you when you get to the "general area" while experiencing a comm failure? Planning to the IAF gives you procedures to follow if this were to happen and all parties involved will know what to expect. z |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why would comm failure be an emergency? If you follow the FARs both you
and ATC know what you should be doing all the way to your planned destination. There should be no safety of flight issue so I think you would have some explaining to do if you "diverted" to a military airfield. BTW I played phone tag today with some air operations officer, I'll try him again tomorrow. I was surprised he even called me back, his secretary wasn't too pleasant. "Well if there's nothing in it for us we aren't gonna let you do a practice approach, but we'll see what the air ops officer says." "Bob Gardner" wrote in : You are going to get a clearance to the airport, no matter what you file. Filing to an IAF is not necessary, IMHO. Comm failure is an emergency situation, opening the door to doing whatever you want to do under the PIC privilege. Bob Gardner "zatatime" wrote in message ... On 7 Jul 2004 09:53:20 -0700, (Robert M. Gary) wrote: Whenever you are going to a semi-busy airport, don't worry about filing all the way to the IAF, just to the general area. You'll always get vectors anyway. What do you when you get to the "general area" while experiencing a comm failure? Planning to the IAF gives you procedures to follow if this were to happen and all parties involved will know what to expect. z |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Responding to a couple of different postings with a single reply, sorry...
Yossarian wrote: Why would comm failure be an emergency? If you follow the FARs both you and ATC know what you should be doing all the way to your planned destination. There should be no safety of flight issue so I think you You need to know what the FARs say so you can parrot it back for your oral exam. However, there's a huge consensus that the best thing to do when you lose comm and still have navigation capability is: get on the ground as quickly as possible using any available nearby approach (assuming IMC, of course). I agree with this consensus. You're free to decide for yourself. would have some explaining to do if you "diverted" to a military airfield. I didn't hear anyone advocating diverting to a military airfield due to lost comm. BTW I played phone tag today with some air operations officer, I'll try him again tomorrow. I was surprised he even called me back, his secretary wasn't too pleasant. "Well if there's nothing in it for us we aren't gonna let you do a practice approach, but we'll see what the air ops officer says." "Bob Gardner" wrote in : You are going to get a clearance to the airport, no matter what you file. Filing to an IAF is not necessary, IMHO. Comm failure is an emergency situation, opening the door to doing whatever you want to do under the PIC privilege. Bob Gardner "zatatime" wrote in message . .. On 7 Jul 2004 09:53:20 -0700, (Robert M. Gary) wrote: Whenever you are going to a semi-busy airport, don't worry about filing all the way to the IAF, just to the general area. You'll always get vectors anyway. What do you when you get to the "general area" while experiencing a comm failure? Planning to the IAF gives you procedures to follow if this were to happen and all parties involved will know what to expect. Planning is fine, but in general -filing- doesn't do much for you. You fly the route you are cleared for, not the one you filed. In general, clearances are to the airport, at least in my part of the USA. You might as well just file to the airport to begin with. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTW I played phone tag today with some air operations officer, I'll try
him again tomorrow. I was surprised he even called me back, his secretary wasn't too pleasant. "Well if there's nothing in it for us we aren't gonna let you do a practice approach, but we'll see what the air ops officer says." Sounds like you are trying this the civilian way by trying to get all the top brass to agree to this. The military way would be to just fly down there and ask the controller. If the controller is bored he'll probably do it. We do practice approaches into Beale AFB and Travis AFB around here and I've never known anyone to call ahead of time. Worst case, they say no. Are you trying for a PAR approach?? -Robert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
If the controller is bored he'll probably do it. We do practice approaches into Beale AFB and Travis AFB around here and I've never known anyone to call ahead of time. Don't controllers need to maintain currency on ASR/PAR approaches? I seem to recall hearing this somewhere... - Andrew |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I fly out of a military airfield. The controllers at this low-traffic field
are always eager to have pilots fly practice PAR approaches because they much prefer to maintain their currency with live approaches rather than the simulator. They frequently ask if we can give them a practice approach. Usually I am flying with a student and I don't want to use the student's time to give the controllers a practice approach, but sometimes the student thinks it will be a hoot so we do it. Any pilot can request a practice approach, low approach only, and if the PAR is operational, they will definitely get it. No prior coordination is necessary. I guess one could call ahead to see if the PAR is operational, but that is available via NOTAM. Flying over Fort Knox once, the controller there offered a low approach on his own initiative. "Andrew Gideon" wrote in message online.com... Robert M. Gary wrote: If the controller is bored he'll probably do it. We do practice approaches into Beale AFB and Travis AFB around here and I've never known anyone to call ahead of time. Don't controllers need to maintain currency on ASR/PAR approaches? I seem to recall hearing this somewhere... - Andrew |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Robert M. Gary wrote: Sounds like you are trying this the civilian way by trying to get all the top brass to agree to this. The military way would be to just fly down there and ask the controller. If the controller is bored he'll probably do it. We do practice approaches into Beale AFB and Travis AFB around here and I've never known anyone to call ahead of time. Worst case, they say no. Are you trying for a PAR approach?? -Robert You're right; most watch supervisors are not willing to commit for practice approach approvals ahead of time, because they don't want to create any potential delays for base assigned aircraft. On the other hand, if you're in the area and ask, they'll get you in as long as the traffic at the base isn't heavy. Don't bother asking the "air ops officer" or "Chief, Air Traffic Control Operations" or anybody else other than the controllers that are working the facility. You can relay this request through the TRACON or Center. Incidentally, military controllers frequently notify the TRACON that they need practice approach aircraft for controller training purposes, so they may be sitting there just waiting for you to call! JPH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |