![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
too late, and you're right--it was a mistake
Aluckyguess wrote: Wow! That was a interesting flight. I don't think I would tell the wife. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-06-07, Capt.Doug wrote:
cabin is small and noisy. The fly-over noise is loud. I got rid of it and bought another Aztec. You can say that again. We have a C337 up at our airfield now, and the noise complaints are coming. The owner had to move from his own land because he was generating excessive noise complaints (it doesn't help that he flies in a rather unneighbourly manner - advancing the props to fine on downwind and directly overflying noise sensitive areas that are easy to avoid). -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The second engine is very handy, and I like the in-line aspect, at
least in this case. One interesting thing about this emergency--my autopilot wouldn't work after the electrical failure, so I had to pump the gear down and fly the plane at the same time. When the gear came out, the increased drag caused a loss of airspeed, and I dropped below "blue line" for a short while. That's not really a problem in the 337, but if I had been in a conventional light twin, that might have been disastrous. I found it hard to manually fly the plane, holding course, altitude, airspeed, etc and bend over and pump the gear down at the same time. three-eight-hotel wrote: Glad to hear you were able to land safely! That second engine sure can come in handy, in a pinch, ehhh? Best Regards, Todd |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-06-08, swag wrote:
caused a loss of airspeed, and I dropped below "blue line" for a short while. That's not really a problem in the 337, but if I had been in a conventional light twin, that might have been disastrous. Dropping below blue line in a conventional twin has exactly the same consequences as dropping below blue line in a C337. I think you are thinking about red line (which is something a C337 won't have) -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "swag" writes: [...] When the gear came out, the increased drag caused a loss of airspeed, and I dropped below "blue line" for a short while. That's not really a problem in the 337, but if I had been in a conventional light twin, that might have been disastrous. [...] You are probably mixing up the red (Vmc) & blue (Vyse) lines. Still, neither is that bad if one has some altitude to spare and avoids being hamfisted with the throttle. - FChE |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The landing gear doors on the C337 and the C210 models with
doors, open like big flat plate air-brakes. The gear is best left down and locked if you have an engine failure below 500 feet. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "Frank Ch. Eigler" wrote in message ... | | "swag" writes: | | [...] When the gear came out, the increased drag caused a loss of | airspeed, and I dropped below "blue line" for a short while. That's | not really a problem in the 337, but if I had been in a conventional | light twin, that might have been disastrous. [...] | | You are probably mixing up the red (Vmc) & blue (Vyse) lines. Still, | neither is that bad if one has some altitude to spare and avoids being | hamfisted with the throttle. | | - FChE |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you're right about the def's of blue line and red line. I guess I was
just trying to make the point that pumping the gear down in the pattern adds another potential problem to the scenario that might be magnified by off center thrust. It would feel more comfortable to be above pattern altitude, but I didn't feel like I had the luxury to climb and take my time. I probably did...but my fuel guages went to zero when I lost electrical, and although I "knew" I had over 40 gallons of fuel left, I was really too nervous about everything to choose the best course of action-- which would have been to circle up over the airport to maybe 3000 agl and then pump the gear down. (If my fuel guages were right and a bad fuel leak had developed I would still be ok if I was in gliding distance of the airport) Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: "swag" writes: [...] When the gear came out, the increased drag caused a loss of airspeed, and I dropped below "blue line" for a short while. That's not really a problem in the 337, but if I had been in a conventional light twin, that might have been disastrous. [...] You are probably mixing up the red (Vmc) & blue (Vyse) lines. Still, neither is that bad if one has some altitude to spare and avoids being hamfisted with the throttle. - FChE |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
TSA requirement of Security Awareness Training | dancingstar | Piloting | 3 | October 5th 04 02:17 AM |
In-Flight Engine Failure | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 59 | April 30th 04 08:40 AM |
Autorotation ? R22 for the Experts | Eric D | Rotorcraft | 22 | March 5th 04 06:11 AM |
Engine failure rates poll | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 3 | December 8th 03 02:44 PM |