![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rapoport wrote:
Recently the COE VOR was notamed OTS. Coincedent with this the KSZT LOC/DME was notamed NA. The explanation given was that the COE VOR was nessasary to fly the tranition (COE is the IAF) and the missed approach (the missed ends with a hold at the COE VOR). I contend that GPS can substitute for the VOR but I can't find it witten down anywhere. The KSZT LOC, DME and ADF are all working properly. Our question is: Was the KSZT LOC/DME approach improperly NOTAMed NA? Can you cite a source? Remember we are talking about substituting GPS for the VOR to fly the transition, we are not talking about substituting for the LOC. Mike, Google "FAA, sole source navigation, GPS" There are many articles out there. From what I skimmed, we are still in transition to becoming sole source. Sole source is dependent upon other parts such as WAAS and LAAS becoming accepted as operational. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|