![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/14/06 10:35, Peter wrote:
Sam Spade wrote If the approach doesn't have "or GPS" in the title; e.g, "VOR Runway 18" the avionics vendor can still elect to have the approach in the database but it cannot invoke approach senesitivity nor RAIM for the final approach segment. In other words, it would be advisory only and only "additional pilot information" to the VOR approach terminal routes and final approach segment. That apears to be what's happened in Europe (Jepp database) but I will have a look at some of these to see if the "GPS" flag shows. I've never seen it showing before. What does your KLN94 Pilot's Guide say in the section on selecting approaches? Here is a note from the Pilot's Guide that I'm using: NOTE: Those approaches not having the letters GPS to the right of the approach name are not approved for GPS. Therefore, the KLN 94 may ONLY be used to provide situational awareness and monitoring for these approaches. When a non-approved approach is selected a page is displayed for the pilot to acknowledge by pressing the Fbutton (figure 6- 10). When a non-approved approach is selected the unit will remain in approach arm mode (or terminal mode) and will not transition to the approach active mode. Now, if your unit follows the same rules, and none of your approaches have "gps" next to them, then what good is the fact that the unit is certified for IFR Approaches? Something must be missing... -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|