![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Chip Jones wrote: From an ATC stand-point, most controllers certainly could care less what a hold looks like when flown. Personally, I just want you to maintain assigned altitude and meander in orbit somewhere over the fix in the general direction assigned. We controllers get really conservative around holding patterns, and a tightly-flown pattern really doesn't matter. Likely, no one in ATC-land will even notice if you nail the turns and the times, because they are looking at a lot of other stuff on the scope. The prudent controller will be using vertical separation below and above your protected airspace, and he/she will be adding a lot of extra lateral protection around your bubble too, just in case. And unless you are in a charted holding pattern the idea of a protected side and unprotected side is pretty funny too. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Checkride bust (long) | Wizard of Draws | Instrument Flight Rules | 9 | July 14th 04 12:53 AM |
Flight test update - long | nauga | Home Built | 1 | June 5th 04 03:09 AM |
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Home Built | 20 | May 21st 04 03:02 PM |
IFR Long X/C and the Specter of Expectations | David B. Cole | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | February 24th 04 07:51 PM |
Hold "as published"? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 83 | November 13th 03 03:19 PM |