![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jim Macklin wrote: Come to Kansas for a few days, any time of the year. We often have winds that are 25G40, most of our runways are pretty well laid out, but some airports do require a crosswind landing. Of course, we routinely solo students as long as the wind is less than 25 knots and the gusts are minimal. But since this is Kansas, where the wind comes sweeping down the plains, we often can have a solid day or two of steady 25 to 40 knot winds. Our bad weather starts at 60 knots with 2 inch hail (a golf ball is 1-3/4 inch). One day I remember watching the airliners land. It was calm and they all were landing very long, those calm winds are a real problem. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P That was exactly my observation too when I lived in Albuquerque. I used to solo students at 25 knots. When I moved east, I got all kind of weird looks and comments like "test pilot" and "against the aircraft certificaton" etc.. when I tried to send students in more than 10 knots. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
Jim Macklin wrote: Come to Kansas for a few days, any time of the year. We often have winds that are 25G40, most of our runways are pretty well laid out, but some airports do require a crosswind landing. Of course, we routinely solo students as long as the wind is less than 25 knots and the gusts are minimal. But since this is Kansas, where the wind comes sweeping down the plains, we often can have a solid day or two of steady 25 to 40 knot winds. Our bad weather starts at 60 knots with 2 inch hail (a golf ball is 1-3/4 inch). One day I remember watching the airliners land. It was calm and they all were landing very long, those calm winds are a real problem. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P That was exactly my observation too when I lived in Albuquerque. I used to solo students at 25 knots. When I moved east, I got all kind of weird looks and comments like "test pilot" and "against the aircraft certificaton" etc.. when I tried to send students in more than 10 knots. If the 25 knots was orthogonal to the runway, then I understand the weird looks. If it was a headwind aligned with the runway, then not a big deal. Taxiing might be a little interesting if the trainer is a C152, but landing should be easy ... and very short! Matt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess what I was trying to say was those who live in less windy areas
tend to think of the "demonstrated crosswind" are a real limitation. Matt Whiting wrote: Andrew Sarangan wrote: Jim Macklin wrote: Come to Kansas for a few days, any time of the year. We often have winds that are 25G40, most of our runways are pretty well laid out, but some airports do require a crosswind landing. Of course, we routinely solo students as long as the wind is less than 25 knots and the gusts are minimal. But since this is Kansas, where the wind comes sweeping down the plains, we often can have a solid day or two of steady 25 to 40 knot winds. Our bad weather starts at 60 knots with 2 inch hail (a golf ball is 1-3/4 inch). One day I remember watching the airliners land. It was calm and they all were landing very long, those calm winds are a real problem. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P That was exactly my observation too when I lived in Albuquerque. I used to solo students at 25 knots. When I moved east, I got all kind of weird looks and comments like "test pilot" and "against the aircraft certificaton" etc.. when I tried to send students in more than 10 knots. If the 25 knots was orthogonal to the runway, then I understand the weird looks. If it was a headwind aligned with the runway, then not a big deal. Taxiing might be a little interesting if the trainer is a C152, but landing should be easy ... and very short! Matt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, they do think that. It is a fact that was just as much
wind as was blowing the day they did the proving test for certification. The FAR 23 sets a minimum wind as a function of stall speed, but with proper technique the actual limit is much higher. Just to make the point, if the runway is 3,500 x 150 feet and the crosswind is 40 knots, you can land at an angle on the runway, reducing the crosswind component. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message oups.com... |I guess what I was trying to say was those who live in less windy areas | tend to think of the "demonstrated crosswind" are a real limitation. | | | Matt Whiting wrote: | Andrew Sarangan wrote: | Jim Macklin wrote: | | Come to Kansas for a few days, any time of the year. We | often have winds that are 25G40, most of our runways are | pretty well laid out, but some airports do require a | crosswind landing. Of course, we routinely solo students as | long as the wind is less than 25 knots and the gusts are | minimal. But since this is Kansas, where the wind comes | sweeping down the plains, we often can have a solid day or | two of steady 25 to 40 knot winds. Our bad weather starts | at 60 knots with 2 inch hail (a golf ball is 1-3/4 inch). | | One day I remember watching the airliners land. It was calm | and they all were landing very long, those calm winds are a | real problem. | | | -- | James H. Macklin | ATP,CFI,A&P | | | | That was exactly my observation too when I lived in Albuquerque. I used | to solo students at 25 knots. When I moved east, I got all kind of | weird looks and comments like "test pilot" and "against the aircraft | certificaton" etc.. when I tried to send students in more than 10 | knots. | | | If the 25 knots was orthogonal to the runway, then I understand the | weird looks. If it was a headwind aligned with the runway, then not a | big deal. Taxiing might be a little interesting if the trainer is a | C152, but landing should be easy ... and very short! | | Matt | |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 01:08:10 -0500, "Jim Macklin"
wrote: Yes, they do think that. It is a fact that was just as much wind as was blowing the day they did the proving test for certification. The FAR 23 sets a minimum wind as a function of stall speed, but with proper technique the actual limit is much higher. Just to make the point, if the runway is 3,500 x 150 feet and the crosswind is 40 knots, you can land at an angle on the runway, reducing the crosswind component. The maximum demonstrated cross wind component for the Debonair I fly is 12 knots. It is quite capable of handeling a direct (90 degree) cross wind of 25 knots. That BTW is both its limit and my limit (when I've been practicing and am proficient). The 150s I've flown could handle at least that much, but it took far more skill to handle them in strong cross winds than it does the Deb. They are much ligher with far less inertia and react much more quickly to the wind changes. My first cross long cross country was in winds that at times reached 30 knots and I had at least a 15 knot, 90 degree cross wind at the first landing. I took the approach (no pun intended) that I would give it a try but I didn't have to land and would only do so if every thing went well. It did. Flying in high winds is not at all uncommon in the Mid West and particularly the Great Planes states. If you really want winds use the airports just off the "Front Range". OTOH They consider less than 75 miles poor visibility while the Great Lakes states consider 1500 and three great VFR. Any one remember how the story goes about the pilot from the Great Lakes and the one from out West feeling their way around a hangar in fog and 10 knot winds or something like that? Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/05/06 12:22, Roger (K8RI) wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 01:08:10 -0500, "Jim Macklin" wrote: Flying in high winds is not at all uncommon in the Mid West and particularly the Great Planes states. If you really want winds use the airports just off the "Front Range". OTOH They consider less than 75 miles poor visibility while the Great Lakes states consider 1500 and three great VFR. Any one remember how the story goes about the pilot from the Great Lakes and the one from out West feeling their way around a hangar in fog and 10 knot winds or something like that? They both agreed that what they were feeling was an elephant, right? ;-) -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
I guess what I was trying to say was those who live in less windy areas tend to think of the "demonstrated crosswind" are a real limitation. Yes, that is true. I learned at a mountaintop airport in PA with an east/west runway, but with a large valley (called the PA Grand Canyon) that runs north/south just southwest of the airport that channels the prevailing west wind into a north of south wind right across the runway. The only crosswind limitation I was taught was running out of rudder. and even then, you could land on the grass strip as it would take a little bit of lateral misalignment at touchdown. I don't know what the limit for a Skylane is, but I've landed in 18K crosswinds before. Since I never crashed it, I don't really know the limit. :-) Matt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Positioning the flight controls properly is essential. Too
many pilots trained in calm winds only [It windy today should mean go fly, too often it is a day for ground school] only. They are always at the mercy of any weather change. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... | Andrew Sarangan wrote: | Jim Macklin wrote: | | Come to Kansas for a few days, any time of the year. We | often have winds that are 25G40, most of our runways are | pretty well laid out, but some airports do require a | crosswind landing. Of course, we routinely solo students as | long as the wind is less than 25 knots and the gusts are | minimal. But since this is Kansas, where the wind comes | sweeping down the plains, we often can have a solid day or | two of steady 25 to 40 knot winds. Our bad weather starts | at 60 knots with 2 inch hail (a golf ball is 1-3/4 inch). | | One day I remember watching the airliners land. It was calm | and they all were landing very long, those calm winds are a | real problem. | | | -- | James H. Macklin | ATP,CFI,A&P | | | | That was exactly my observation too when I lived in Albuquerque. I used | to solo students at 25 knots. When I moved east, I got all kind of | weird looks and comments like "test pilot" and "against the aircraft | certificaton" etc.. when I tried to send students in more than 10 | knots. | | | If the 25 knots was orthogonal to the runway, then I understand the | weird looks. If it was a headwind aligned with the runway, then not a | big deal. Taxiing might be a little interesting if the trainer is a | C152, but landing should be easy ... and very short! | | Matt |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:9HCAg.85011$ZW3.63530@dukeread04... Positioning the flight controls properly is essential. Too many pilots trained in calm winds only [It windy today should mean go fly, too often it is a day for ground school] only. They are always at the mercy of any weather change. Couldn't agree more. When I was training, we experienced the aircraft's maximum headwind and crosswind at various times, and it was valuable experience - if only to demonstrate that the wing didn't bang into the ground even though it looked like it was going to! And I remember the first calm day - landed considerably further into the runway than ever before! D. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have taken off with calm winds and had 40 knots 1/2 an
hour later. If you don't teach students to fly in strong winds, you are not preparing them for changes in the weather. First solo at 25 knots isn't a problem, we have probably flown many dual lessons at 25 knots or more. We also seek out strong crosswinds. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message oups.com... | | Jim Macklin wrote: | Come to Kansas for a few days, any time of the year. We | often have winds that are 25G40, most of our runways are | pretty well laid out, but some airports do require a | crosswind landing. Of course, we routinely solo students as | long as the wind is less than 25 knots and the gusts are | minimal. But since this is Kansas, where the wind comes | sweeping down the plains, we often can have a solid day or | two of steady 25 to 40 knot winds. Our bad weather starts | at 60 knots with 2 inch hail (a golf ball is 1-3/4 inch). | | One day I remember watching the airliners land. It was calm | and they all were landing very long, those calm winds are a | real problem. | | | -- | James H. Macklin | ATP,CFI,A&P | | | That was exactly my observation too when I lived in Albuquerque. I used | to solo students at 25 knots. When I moved east, I got all kind of | weird looks and comments like "test pilot" and "against the aircraft | certificaton" etc.. when I tried to send students in more than 10 | knots. | |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Definition of simulated instrument conditions | bsalai | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | February 4th 06 11:33 PM |
Cleared for an approach, then given a different altitude assignment | Peter R. | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | December 11th 04 04:44 PM |
Tips on Getting Your Instrument Rating Sooner and at Lower Cost | Fred | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | October 19th 04 07:31 AM |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
Logging instrument approaches | Slav Inger | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | July 27th 03 11:00 PM |