![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "gregscheetah" wrote in message ups.com... A recent flight planning software package I am trying creates a single flight plan - say from DSM to Jeffco. Even tho there is a fuel stop in KLBF, about midway. This is what it wants to file with DUATS. My question is: I have always thought it was necessary to file two flight plans - one DSM to KLBF and another KLBF to Jeffco. Is this necessary? Or can I file a single flight plan? Is the Voyager software making a mistake? A "through clearance" is a possibility. It's useful for brief stops at locations without direct pilot/controller communications. But stops for fuel tend to be longer than what most would consider to be brief, and there is direct pilot/controller communications on the surface at LBF so a through clearance offers no advantage. Just file two flight plans. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
ink.net: A "through clearance" is a possibility. It's useful for brief stops at locations without direct pilot/controller communications. But stops for fuel tend to be longer than what most would consider to be brief, and there is direct pilot/controller communications on the surface at LBF so a through clearance offers no advantage. Just file two flight plans. We sometimes get a through clearance on offshore flights. We file 2 plans, but due to the lack of ATC radar and communications coverage, we can almost never talk to anyone to get our inbound clearance, other than through company communications specialists, who have to call FSS, who calls center, and get everything relayed a few times. If we're just stopping to drop off & pick up passengers, we often ask for our inbound clearance with a void time before we descend out of radio coverage. If there is no other IFR traffice, center may give us a through clearance, combining our cruise clearance to the rig with our inbound clearance. When the system is barely viable in the first place, some flexibility is necessary. -- Regards, Stan "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |