![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Correct, but the video's show the skid starts about 1/2 mile off a 3500 ft
runway. I suspect a full loaded CRJ needs a bit more than that for a safe take off. They also have now stated he was cleared for 22 a 7500 ft runway. But as you state this is all speculation at this point. john smith wrote: In article , wrote: Early reports indicate that the plane tookoff (or failed to takeoff as the case may be) on the wrong runway,a runway that was too short. Only a fools and idiots speculate on the cause of an airplane crash before the facts are known. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well looks like a terrible mistake if he took off on 26 instead of 22:
CRJ200 ER FAR take-off field length (SL, ISA) at MTOW 5,800 ft 1,768 m FAR 121 landing field length (SL) at MLW 4,850 ft 1,479 m CRJ200 LR FAR take-off field length (SL, ISA) at MTOW 6,290 ft 1,918 m FAR landing field length (SL) at MLW 4,850 ft 1,479 m These came from the factory website, looks like he needed allot more runway. Ronald Gardner wrote: Correct, but the video's show the skid starts about 1/2 mile off a 3500 ft runway. I suspect a full loaded CRJ needs a bit more than that for a safe take off. They also have now stated he was cleared for 22 a 7500 ft runway. But as you state this is all speculation at this point. john smith wrote: In article , wrote: Early reports indicate that the plane tookoff (or failed to takeoff as the case may be) on the wrong runway,a runway that was too short. Only a fools and idiots speculate on the cause of an airplane crash before the facts are known. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ronald Gardner wrote: Well looks like a terrible mistake if he took off on 26 instead of 22: CRJ200 ER FAR take-off field length (SL, ISA) at MTOW 5,800 ft 1,768 m FAR 121 landing field length (SL) at MLW 4,850 ft 1,479 m CRJ200 LR FAR take-off field length (SL, ISA) at MTOW 6,290 ft 1,918 m FAR landing field length (SL) at MLW 4,850 ft 1,479 m I strongly suspect that 6,290 figure is the length of runway for the plane to accelerate to V1, take a engine cut, and stop on the runway using only brakes, with no credit for reverse thrust. The distance for a nominal takeoff roll is much shorter. So sad . . . my prayers for the families of the folks on board, passengers and crew. John |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Approaches and takeoff mins. | jamin3508 | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | September 14th 05 02:51 AM |
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
Overweight takeoff / flight | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 50 | December 3rd 03 11:53 PM |