to HSI or not to HSI

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:06:18 -0500, "Rod Madsen"
wrote:


"Blanche" wrote in message
...
In article ,
wrote:

I say again.

Totally ridiculous.

Don't you just love people who use anonymous remailers or forged
names when involved with an allegedly legitimate discussion?

Shouldn't there be some way the discussion group could just reject such
messages? We don't need 'em.

Rod


Isn't that why they make "ignore" boxes?

Or, let me see now...

Maybe you could just ignore them on your own??????

By the way, how do I know you are who you say you are?

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:01:48 GMT, wrote:

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:06:18 -0500, "Rod Madsen"
wrote:


"Blanche" wrote in message
...
In article ,
wrote:

I say again.

Totally ridiculous.

Don't you just love people who use anonymous remailers or forged
names when involved with an allegedly legitimate discussion?

Shouldn't there be some way the discussion group could just reject such
messages? We don't need 'em.

Rod


Isn't that why they make "ignore" boxes?

Or, let me see now...

Maybe you could just ignore them on your own??????

By the way, how do I know you are who you say you are?


Come to think of it, why should I even care?

Let me answer my own question. I don't.

So please don't feel obligated to answer.

wrote:

Isn't that why they make "ignore" boxes?

Killfile after I respond to this.

Or, let me see now...

Maybe you could just ignore them on your own??????

By the way, how do I know you are who you say you are?


Do you *really* think I'd use the name "Blanche" as an alias?
Besides, there are people on this list who I've met in
person.

It's an issue of credibility. You are advocating an approach to
instructing that altho is intriguing, without any credibility
because you're using forged/false DNS address.

Bye-bye.