![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:38:45 GMT, "Hilton"
wrote: I'll bite. What is a p-t-d entry? Parallel, Teardrop, Direct??? So it's now one entry? Or are you saying you can go fly holds and enter any which way you want? If so, you'll end up doing one of these (or some version thereof) anyway. I'm saying exactly that. The only requirement is to stay within holding airspace. The FAA finally wised up a few years back, and removed the requirement from the PTS. Nevertheless, it remains a part of the written, while knowledge of important things like obstaccle departure procedures remains ignored on both the written and the practical test, and lives are no doubt lost as a result. It's idiotic. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:38:45 GMT, "Hilton" wrote: I'll bite. What is a p-t-d entry? Parallel, Teardrop, Direct??? So it's now one entry? Or are you saying you can go fly holds and enter any which way you want? If so, you'll end up doing one of these (or some version thereof) anyway. I'm saying exactly that. The only requirement is to stay within holding airspace. The FAA finally wised up a few years back, and removed the requirement from the PTS. Nevertheless, it remains a part of the written It also remains a requirement on most FAA approved part 141 syllabi, so the entries have to be taught to competency whether they are part of the PTS or not. The standard entries do guarantee that you will remain in the protected holding airspace and are recommended in AIM, the FAA Instrument Flying Handbook, and the FAA Instrument Procedures Handbook, all of which is where the FAA draws its test questions from. The operations manuals for FAA approved commercial IFR operators also often specify what holding pattern entries the operator's pilots will use. Since these are the standard methods and many students will be required by their employers to use them, there is little point in teaching anything else. If you want to do something else, of course, you are perfectly free to do so. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell wrote:
The operations manuals for FAA approved commercial IFR operators also often specify what holding pattern entries the operator's pilots will use. Since these are the standard methods and many students will be required by their employers to use them, there is little point in teaching anything else. I don't see anything wrong with teaching or learning them, but I can also see how it's much more important for a commercial pilot flying high performance aircraft than for a spam can driver. If you're holding at 210 kts (and maybe limited to less than standard rate turns by your FD), you're going to eat up a lot of sky. The correct entry may be the only thing keeping you from blowing out of the protected area. This is much less likely to be an issue at 90 kts. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IR written Primary/Secondary instrument questions | Jeremy | Instrument Flight Rules | 35 | February 20th 04 11:02 PM |
Another Instrument written question.... | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | October 29th 03 05:47 PM |
IFR written passed | Tune2828 | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | August 12th 03 10:01 PM |
Thinking about getting my IFR rating - Written test programs???? | Grey Stone | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | July 22nd 03 01:08 AM |