![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G. Sylvester writes:
First off, I'm a (very) light a/c IFR pilot. But having listened to Channel 9 on UA for 135000 miles this past year ... Is that like spending hundreds of hours with a simulator? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic writes:
G. Sylvester writes: First off, I'm a (very) light a/c IFR pilot. But having listened to Channel 9 on UA for 135000 miles this past year ... Is that like spending hundreds of hours with a simulator? No, it takes hundreds of hours flying an actual plane to get to be an IFR pilot. Having simulator experience helps a person understand the environment, but it's not the same as having actually had a scary learning experience in real life. Guaranteed that THOSE are the lessons you learn from. -Jack |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Cunniff wrote:
No, it takes hundreds of hours flying an actual plane to get to be an IFR pilot. Having simulator experience helps a person understand the environment, but it's not the same as having actually had a scary learning experience in real life. Guaranteed that THOSE are the lessons you learn from. -Jack Where did you get that idea? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:51:03 -0800, Sam Spade
wrote: Jack Cunniff wrote: No, it takes hundreds of hours flying an actual plane to get to be an IFR pilot. Having simulator experience helps a person understand the environment, but it's not the same as having actually had a scary learning experience in real life. Guaranteed that THOSE are the lessons you learn from. -Jack Where did you get that idea? Sounds like the voice of experience to me:-)) Been there and done that. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:51:03 -0800, Sam Spade wrote: Jack Cunniff wrote: No, it takes hundreds of hours flying an actual plane to get to be an IFR pilot. Having simulator experience helps a person understand the environment, but it's not the same as having actually had a scary learning experience in real life. Guaranteed that THOSE are the lessons you learn from. -Jack Where did you get that idea? Sounds like the voice of experience to me:-)) Been there and done that. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com What is the regulation that requires "hundreds of hours flying" to obtain an instrument rating? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the regulation that requires "hundreds of hours flying" to obtain
an instrument rating? at least 250 hours Federal Air Regulation 61.129 a (single engine) and b (multi engine) http://tinyurl.com/yk44ov or, in its long form http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text.... 1.1.2.6.1.2 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Mulroy wrote:
What is the regulation that requires "hundreds of hours flying" to obtain an instrument rating? at least 250 hours Federal Air Regulation 61.129 a (single engine) and b (multi engine) http://tinyurl.com/yk44ov or, in its long form http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text.... 1.1.2.6.1.2 That is the section for a commercial certificate. The instrument rating requirements are in 61.65. So where is the requirement for "hundreds of flying hours" to obtain an instrument rating? Matt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:25:46 -0500, "Ed Mulroy"
wrote: What is the regulation that requires "hundreds of hours flying" to obtain an instrument rating? at least 250 hours Federal Air Regulation 61.129 a (single engine) and b (multi engine) http://tinyurl.com/yk44ov or, in its long form http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text.... 1.1.2.6.1.2 You seem to be confusing the Instrument requirement with the Commercial requirement. The IR does not need the 250 hours required for the Commercial (at least in the U.S.) You might want to go back and read the proper section. :-) -Jay- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:02:01 -0500, Roger
wrote: On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:51:03 -0800, Sam Spade wrote: Jack Cunniff wrote: No, it takes hundreds of hours flying an actual plane to get to be an IFR pilot. Having simulator experience helps a person understand the environment, but it's not the same as having actually had a scary learning experience in real life. Guaranteed that THOSE are the lessons you learn from. -Jack Where did you get that idea? Sounds like the voice of experience to me:-)) Been there and done that. I thought you were referring to the experience and THOSE lessons, not the hundreds of hours. Certainly the rating can be earned with less than 200 hours so hundreds (plural) would be in excess of the requirements. Most are going to have more than that, but it's not a minimum requirement. 61.65.d.1,2. As to required experience you must first obtain the PPL which requires a minimum of 40 hours combined dual and solo. I believe we've had three at our airport do it in 40 in recent years (I wasn't one) Then for the Instrument the minimum is 50 hours cross country as PIC , 40 hours of actual or simulated operation that includes at least 15 hours dual instruction and 3 hours dual instruction within 60 days of the PTS. I don't see as it's possible in less than about 120 hours. HOWEVER I think it is possible to do in under 100 hours of actual flight time in a part 142 school. Any one care to do the math figuring the absolute minimums in which an instrument rating could be earned? In the real world it's a very rare individual who comes any where near these figures, but that was not the question. Approved sim time 61.65.e 30 hours for a part 142 school or 20 hours if not part 142. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger wrote:
In the real world it's a very rare individual who comes any where near these figures, but that was not the question. When I was a lad, I spent my last year as an elisted guy in the USAF. I had unlimited access to an F-100 flight simulator and a Link C-11 (similar to a T-33 with VOR, ME, RMI, ILS, ADF). I also finished my private pilot ticket midway during that year. At the end of the year I started instrument training in a Piper Tri-Pacer. It was like shooting ducks in barrel, age 20 and all that fast simulator time. I was not anyone special. I am sure there are young enlisted boys and girls who have simulator access like I did and who are training at an Air Force aero club. They all probably ace the IR in no time at all. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Propeller thrust question | xerj | Piloting | 11 | November 25th 05 03:12 AM |
Crosswind Landings... But airspeed? | Jmarc99 | Soaring | 21 | October 4th 05 07:54 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
speed record set by scramjet - fair? | Don French | Piloting | 55 | November 28th 04 01:57 PM |
Overweight takeoff / flight | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 50 | December 3rd 03 11:53 PM |