![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(not the same PDF/MFD but
close). Well, not really, according to what most people write. They say the Avidyne is easier since the 430 is extra. The G1000 is much more integrated and thus more complex. That said, IMHO two points are worth considering: 1. As you noted, there's a vast difference between flying VFR and hard IFR with these things. 2. IMHO there is a big difference in how prepared pilots arrive for learning a new aircraft or system. FBOs would probably adapt their requirements to the lowest end of the spectrum. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 3:39 pm, wrote:
Our CAP unit is going to be receiving a new C-182 with a glass cockpit. In order to give us a taste of it a Cirrus owner came to our CAP meeting and showed us his wonderful aircraft (not the same PDF/MFD but close). I've heard from many sources that it takes about 10 hours to transition. In fact a local FBO has a brand new C-182 (rents for about $200/hr) and requires 15 hours. Although I didn't fly the Cirrus, I sat in the aircraft while the owner spoke with someone else. He said we could push any buttons we wanted to. So, I tried to think of all the things I could normally do on an IFR flight. Amazingly, I had no problems with any of the operations. The display is easy for me because my generation grew up flying flight simulators that use the exact same display. The only hard part is figuring out the 430s (which I've done before). So, I'm wondering if all this talk about a long transition time is mostly for the generation that didn't grow up with computers. Just thinking about the time it takes some people (not necessarily based on age) to get familiar with their computer vs. others, I'm wondering if its the same thing. Perhaps I'm being naive but I felt that I could fly behind that panel today. Has anyone on this list had experience with such a transition? -Sammy J. I'm a CAP TAA Check Pilot. The G1000 is not that hard for some, for others its more difficult. Your instructor will take you through the FITS training program that CAP requires. It can be done in as little as 3 hours if you are already 182 current. You will get a new form 5. The first hour is VFR, second is IFR, third is emergency (partial panel approaches, etc). So far, most pilots are not able to complete the IFR piece to F5 standards, so we've been signing a lot of IFR pilots off as "VFR only" on their Form 5's. However, most are able to come back and get the IFR later after some time in the aircraft. The C17 rate for our G1000 182 is $50/hr dry. -Robert, CFII |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 3:39 pm, wrote:
Our CAP unit is going to be receiving a new C-182 with a glass cockpit. In order to give us a taste of it a Cirrus owner came to our CAP meeting and showed us his wonderful aircraft (not the same PDF/MFD but close). I've heard from many sources that it takes about 10 hours to transition. In fact a local FBO has a brand new C-182 (rents for about $200/hr) and requires 15 hours. Although I didn't fly the Cirrus, I sat in the aircraft while the owner spoke with someone else. He said we could push any buttons we wanted to. So, I tried to think of all the things I could normally do on an IFR flight. Amazingly, I had no problems with any of the operations. The display is easy for me because my generation grew up flying flight simulators that use the exact same display. The only hard part is figuring out the 430s (which I've done before). So, I'm wondering if all this talk about a long transition time is mostly for the generation that didn't grow up with computers. Just thinking about the time it takes some people (not necessarily based on age) to get familiar with their computer vs. others, I'm wondering if its the same thing. Perhaps I'm being naive but I felt that I could fly behind that panel today. Has anyone on this list had experience with such a transition? -Sammy J. BTW: The G1000 is much nicer than the Avidine system the Cirrus uses. The G1000 is a fully integrated system, the Avidine has no nav, so you still have a couple 430's in the panel. The CAP G1000 is slightly unique in that it uses two audio panels so that all 3 crew members can transmit on different freq (com#1, com#2, mission radio). We found a bug in ours in that every so often the system powers up in the pilot-iso mode so your pax can't hear you. We think it may be related to our unique dual-audio panel set up. -Robert, CFII |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hamish Reid wrote:
I'm a relatively old geezer and I had no trouble at all with getting signed off at our club for the G1000 C172 after about an hour's flying for VFR (ok, the bloody fam sheet / test thing paperwork that had to be filled out before signoff took forever, but that's just looking things up in the POH and trying not to die of boredom while doing so...). IFR was a bit longer, but only because you really want to be damn sure you know at least the basics of how to reset the GPS and start again (urgh! don't get me started...), and because, well, it's IFR and you want to be familliar with at least the basics (partial panel is interesting on a G1000 172). As others have commented the vertical tape airspeed and altimeter displays can be a little unfamiliar at first, but really, 10 hours seems an awful long time to transition even for IFR and a 182, especially if you already have Garmin GPS 430 or 530 experience. Hamish A suggestion.... Flight Simulator X has aircraft with glass panels. You don't have to buy anything. Download the Demo 2 FSX file and fire up the Baron. I'm fairly sure the Baron is in the demo. But if not, no problem,go to avsim.com and search for "g1000 and download the FSX aircraft that show up. Picture below Hamish, it would be great if you were to look at it. You would know right away if it's worth fooling with. There's a few others here that I'm sure can do the same, I just don't have their names handy. Her are the panels http://xs412.xs.to/xs412/07070/glass-g1000.jpg -- boB copter.six U.S. Army Aviation (retired) Central Texas 5NM West of Gray Army/Killeen Regional (KGRK) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
boB wrote: Hamish Reid wrote: I'm a relatively old geezer and I had no trouble at all with getting signed off at our club for the G1000 C172 after about an hour's flying for VFR (ok, the bloody fam sheet / test thing paperwork that had to be filled out before signoff took forever, but that's just looking things up in the POH and trying not to die of boredom while doing so...). IFR was a bit longer, but only because you really want to be damn sure you know at least the basics of how to reset the GPS and start again (urgh! don't get me started...), and because, well, it's IFR and you want to be familliar with at least the basics (partial panel is interesting on a G1000 172). As others have commented the vertical tape airspeed and altimeter displays can be a little unfamiliar at first, but really, 10 hours seems an awful long time to transition even for IFR and a 182, especially if you already have Garmin GPS 430 or 530 experience. Hamish A suggestion.... Flight Simulator X has aircraft with glass panels. You don't have to buy anything. Download the Demo 2 FSX file and fire up the Baron. I'm fairly sure the Baron is in the demo. But if not, no problem,go to avsim.com and search for "g1000 and download the FSX aircraft that show up. Picture below Hamish, it would be great if you were to look at it. You would know right away if it's worth fooling with. There's a few others here that I'm sure can do the same, I just don't have their names handy. Her are the panels http://xs412.xs.to/xs412/07070/glass-g1000.jpg Looks good from here... I'll probably give it a (metaphorical) spin sometime this week when I get the time (I'm on the verge of getting FSX for real anyway). Looks like ASA's On Top 9 now has a G1000-like (not sure what thay means...) simulation for the 182 too. I sometimes find Garmin's own G1000 simulator to be pretty good for reminding me what all the various soft keys and associated modes do, but I didn't actually use it when getting checked out, and it's not a real sim, of course... Hamish |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Glass big learning curve? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 25 | September 30th 05 04:47 AM |
can't quite grasp the "power available" curve | xerj | Piloting | 6 | September 12th 04 12:33 PM |
Cambridge 302 learning curve cont. | Tuno | Soaring | 4 | July 5th 04 10:10 AM |
learning curve in fs 2002.. | David Ciemny | Simulators | 5 | December 30th 03 12:18 AM |
18m polar curve | Alan Irving | Soaring | 1 | December 15th 03 11:45 PM |