![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Bob Moore writes: You should see what those pylons do in heavy turbulence! The only stress is on the pilot who looks at them. :-) I've seen engine nacelles swaying merrily to and fro (along the wing axis) in turbulence but I didn't know if twisting forces applied to the pylons would be so easily tolerated. Fjukktard Bertie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I.m wondering if the engineering on wings has changed a bit. I worked for
an airline carrier in the early 60's and we took deliver of the first boeing 727 built. the company provied us with a very similar video. Its showed a 727 straped into a cradel and the wings were bent up similar to what this utube shows.. Difference: i watched the wings pushed up to where both tips touched each other many many many times there was not a failur and i do not remeber exactly how many times but it was in the dozens. I wonder what the difference is that this wing breaks after only one raise tom "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .130... Mxsmanic wrote in : Bob Moore writes: You should see what those pylons do in heavy turbulence! The only stress is on the pilot who looks at them. :-) I've seen engine nacelles swaying merrily to and fro (along the wing axis) in turbulence but I didn't know if twisting forces applied to the pylons would be so easily tolerated. Fjukktard Bertie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24 May, 21:40, "tom laudato" tommyann wrote:
I.m wondering if the engineering on wings has changed a bit. I worked for an airline carrier in the early 60's and we took deliver of the first boeing 727 built. the company provied us with a very similar video. Its showed a 727 straped into a cradel and the wings were bent up similar to what this utube shows.. Difference: i watched the wings pushed up to where both tips touched each other many many many times there was not a failur and i do not remeber exactly how many times but it was in the dozens. I wonder what the difference is that this wing breaks after only one raise Nope, essentially the same up to the point where they're sticking Carbon fiber spars in, but the certification standards are the same. A wing pylon will happily accept a consideraable load in just about any flight attitude, what it won't accept is s sudden high G load such as extreme turbulence or an abrupt engine stoppage might cause. you won't break a wing off too easily, though. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Westland Wyvern Prototype - RR Eagle Engine - Rolls Royce Eagle 24cyl Liq Cooled Engine.jpg | Ramapo | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 17th 07 09:14 PM |
Saturn V F-1 Engine Testing at F-1 Engine Test Stand 6866986.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 1 | April 11th 07 04:48 PM |
F-1 Engine for the Saturn V S-IC (first) stage depicts the complexity of the engine 6413912.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 9th 07 01:38 PM |
1710 allison v-12 engine WWII p 38 engine | Holger Stephan | Home Built | 9 | August 21st 03 08:53 AM |
Jettisonable Pylons? | Jeroen Wenting | Military Aviation | 3 | July 6th 03 05:07 AM |