![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gordon wrote: O You know, the Fairey Swordfish made the Devastator look like superplane, but at the attack on Taranto and against the Bismarck, they didn't exactly suck. They were never once sent in against an enemy fleet with an active CAP. Different war. They WERE outmoded, by any stretch or WWII standard. If they were sent in against the IJN carrier fleet under an umbrella of Zeroes, they would have been, well, devastated. Now that's a fascinating idea... Bismarck AA guns couldn't even shoot at them accurately because the were designed to take on aircraft going far faster that that and lead them. Think how fast a Zero would have overrun a Devastator when it's actual airspeed in comparison to the Zero was around 40 mph. We lost the Devastators due to the Japanese having their Zeros up and flying at low altitude. Yes. Going in to attack without any cover in a 100-mph straight and level torpedo plane was suicide, with predictable results. Would the attack have gone differently with Stringbags? Consider this...on that day, we lost virtually all the Devastators, each carrying a two-man crew, since they left the the radio operators behind, and took out three Japanese fleet carriers, and most of their aircrews. For the number of total aircrew we lost, versus what we gained, that was one of the most lopsided victories ever. The Japanese could only dream of such an effect with gain versus casualties in their Kamikaze attacks. To get this home in a more direct sense, lets flip it over. We go up against the Japanese with four carriers. On day one, we lose Lexington, Saratoga, and Enterprise. Next day, we get Kaga, but lose the Hornet. I'd like to see them put a positive spin on that in the papers. Even FDR couldn't make that look upbeat in a fireside chat. :-) If they hadn't been busy attacking the Devastators, those Dauntlesses coming in from above might have had a very tough time putting their bombs down as accurately as they did. Sheer unadulterated luck. Extremely strange, loopy luck, that almost looked like divine intervention. Two carrier groups of SBDs, lost up in the clouds, run into each other by accident, just as the clouds part below them to reveal the Japanese fleet, directly under them, with their CAP at low altitude, their AA crews looking flat to the water, and their crews switching bombs for torpedoes on their decks. You couldn't have _asked_ for anything better than that. I mean seriously...that was _downright_ weird. And the plan didn't call for the TBDs to all be sacrificed - it was a busted plan and an obsolete aircraft that resulted in nearly 100% losses of the attacking force. The SBDs were not, at that point, even a part of the same attack, so giving them credit for 'keeping the Zeroes busy', makes it seem like that task was part of their job. That wasn't the intention, but that's exactly how it worked out. I sure hope they do a movie of that someday... with Ensign Gay hiding under his seat cushion in the water, as he gets to see one-half of the entire carrier fleet that attacked Pearl Harbor get turned into fireballs inside of fifteen minutes as they head toward the horizon. That wouldn't suck at all. Not at all. :-) Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Airplanes don't kill people!, people kill people!" | Laonork | Owning | 8 | May 21st 12 05:56 AM |
Can MSFS Kill you? | Steve Foley | Piloting | 34 | December 8th 06 06:07 AM |
"Airplanes don't kill people!, people kill people!" | Flyingmonk | Piloting | 11 | May 17th 05 10:26 AM |
Kill Kill Kill | Dave LaCourse | Naval Aviation | 1 | January 17th 05 05:18 AM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |