|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
July 24th 07, 01:21 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
VOR approach SMO
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:51:07 -0000, "Robert M. Gary"
wrote: So, in the end it sounds like if everyone on this list had just grabbed the chart and flown the approach, about 3/4 of the people would have died (gone down to 680 before CULVE). Wow, does it seem like the FAA should make this chart a bit more clear? -Robert I think the confusion of some of the posters may have been due to the coincidence of the minimum altitude at CULVE being the same as the circling MDA without CULVE. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VOR approach SMO | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 124 | August 3rd 07 02:17 AM |
| first approach in IMC | G. Sylvester | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 12th 05 02:14 AM |
| No FAF on an ILS approach...? | John Harper | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | December 24th 03 03:54 AM |
| Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |
| Brief an approach | Ditch | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | October 14th 03 12:10 AM |
Hybrid Mode
