![]()  | 
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. | 
		
			
  | 	
	
	
		
		|||||||
  | 
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
		 
			 
			#11  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
On Aug 2, 1:34 am, "Hilton"  wrote: 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	1. Go on a diet 2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6 lbs - Mooney did it. Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it? Hilton At Oshkosh a few pilots complained that our LED landing light was too heavy at 0.9 lbs, which I thought was a bit silly considering that halogen lights of the same function weigh that much and don't put out as much light and take more power. At the same time I was thinking to myself "and if you were to lose a few pounds it wouldn't really matter anyway" but found myself biting my tongue instead... :-p Your message is so true, and I for one could dramatically increase the useful load by losing 10, 20, or even 30 pounds! That's a lot more significant than any fuel weight rounding. Dean AeroLEDs LLC www.aeroleds.com  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#12  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 wrote in message ups.com... On Aug 2, 1:34 am, "Hilton" wrote: 1. Go on a diet 2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6 lbs - Mooney did it. Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it? Hilton At Oshkosh a few pilots complained that our LED landing light was too heavy at 0.9 lbs, which I thought was a bit silly considering that halogen lights of the same function weigh that much and don't put out as much light and take more power. At the same time I was thinking to myself "and if you were to lose a few pounds it wouldn't really matter anyway" but found myself biting my tongue instead... :-p Your message is so true, and I for one could dramatically increase the useful load by losing 10, 20, or even 30 pounds! That's a lot more significant than any fuel weight rounding. I could loose 30 myself. Dean AeroLEDs LLC www.aeroleds.com  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#13  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
Dean, 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	Your message is so true, and I for one could dramatically increase the useful load by losing 10, 20, or even 30 pounds! That's a lot more significant than any fuel weight rounding. A year or two ago, I challenged a friend of mine (my 'flying buddy') to a diet. Within a few months, we had increased our useful 'useful load' by 50 pounds! That's almost like changing the 160hp to a 180hp plus the added health benefits for free. Hilton  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#14  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
("Aluckyguess" wrote) 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	I could loose 30 myself. Black went on a diet and shed 300 lbs! Mont :-)  | 
  | 
    
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Server over-load | Jim Macklin | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | August 17th 06 02:48 AM | 
| New 182T, where's the useful load?? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 10 | April 27th 06 07:48 PM | 
| Bush went to war to raise oil prices. | Garamondextended | Military Aviation | 6 | May 29th 04 03:24 AM | 
| Load supervisers | jfp | Piloting | 0 | April 13th 04 05:25 PM | 
| Load supervisers | jfp | General Aviation | 0 | April 13th 04 05:22 PM |