![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://online.wsj.com/public/article...326095429.html
PAGE ONE FREQUENT FLYING Small Jets, More Trips Worsen Airport Delays FAA Likes Bigger Craft But Passengers, Airlines Prefer Busy Schedules By SCOTT MCCARTNEY August 13, 2007; Page A1 At 5 p.m. last Wednesday, planes from all over were lining up in the air to land at New York's La Guardia Airport. Over the next hour, 41 flights were scheduled to touch down, but there wasn't room for them all. Thirty-three arrived late, one by three hours. With runway space this scarce, you might think that airlines would use big planes that can carry lots of people. Instead, of those 41 flights, 21 involved small commuter aircraft. Five of them were propeller planes. The nation's air-travel system approached gridlock early this summer, with more than 30% of June flights late, by an average of 62 minutes. The mess revved up a perennial debate about whether billions of dollars should be spent to modernize the air-traffic control system. But one cause of airport crowding and flight delays is receiving scant attention. Airlines increasingly bring passengers into jammed airports on smaller airplanes. That means using more flights -- and increasing the congestion at airports and in the skies around them. At La Guardia, half of all flights now involve smaller planes: regional jets and turboprops. It's the same at Chicago's O'Hare, which is spending billions to expand runways. At New Jersey's Newark Liberty and New York's John F. Kennedy, 40% of traffic involves smaller planes, according to Eclat Consulting in Reston, Va. Aircraft numbers tell the tale: U.S. airlines grounded a net 385 large planes from 2000 through 2006 -- but they added 1,029 regional jets -- says data firm Airline Monitor. As air-travel woes have spread, some aviation officials and regulators, including the head of the Federal Aviation Administration, have begun saying delays could be eased if airlines would consolidate some of their numerous flights on larger planes. Just two problems with that. One is that airlines like having more flights with smaller jets. The other is that passengers like it, too. Illustrating the phenomenon, three airlines flying out of midsize Raleigh-Durham, N.C., send 21 flights a day into La Guardia. All but one of the flights use small planes. That's fine with David Sink, a Durham insurance executive. "There are lots of flights, so time-wise, it worked out well for me," said Mr. Sink recently, taking an American Eagle flight home. Given a choice between more flights or larger planes, he'd prefer more flights. The FAA once could tackle congestion by limiting the number of takeoff and landing slots. But Congress in 2000 voted to phase out slot requirements to open up the airways to competition from low-fare carriers. The FAA sets a limit on how many takeoff and landings it can safely handle at each congested airport, but airlines are free to schedule as they want. If there are too many planes because of overscheduling or just delayed flights stacking up, the FAA slows down the flow of airliners. At La Guardia, for example, the FAA allows 75 aircraft movements -- a takeoff or a landing is one movement -- an hour for commercial airlines in good weather. If high winds or storms drop that rate lower, the FAA asks airlines to cancel or delay flights. And sometimes the bottleneck comes not on runways, but in the air when planes from multiple airports are trying to get a spot on specific routes into or out of the area. Much of the traffic into and out of New York meshes together onto specific routes in the Washington, D.C., area; when there are too many planes, it's like multiple lanes of cars squeezing into a two-lane tunnel. Airport Crowding Trying to tackle airport crowding, the FAA last year proposed a complicated plan to force airlines to increase the average size of the planes they land at La Guardia. FAA Administrator Marion Blakey, questioning the use of many smaller planes and their more-numerous flights, says that "from the standpoint of passengers and from the standpoint of getting the best use out of high-priced real estate, this is not the way we should be going." But the FAA plan encountered fierce opposition and is in limbo. "A solution eludes us," Ms. Blakey says. Smaller cities say they need the small planes in order to be connected .... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
THIS Newsgroup needs a cleansing to keep likes of teh Saucherheads off! | Michael Baldwin, Bruce | Products | 21 | January 9th 07 03:23 AM |
The BIGGER problem in the FAA exposed | JohnWayne | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | September 2nd 06 11:21 PM |
Why was the SB2C refered to as the "Beast" when the TBF was bigger? | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 29 | October 15th 05 05:51 AM |
LINDA WEST of Chipman Moving & Storage/CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES likes to commit Fraud & Forgery likes to commit Fraud & Forgery | capaliwoda | Piloting | 0 | October 13th 05 04:08 PM |
Rumsfeld is an even bigger asshole than I thought | noname | Military Aviation | 0 | March 20th 04 03:48 AM |