![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dallas" wrote in message
... What's your opinion, is this a congested area or not? http://tinyurl.com/3okuon My take is that this is an "other than congested area", but a recent article in AOPA magazine discussing an FAA ruling gives congested area a pretty broad definition. I've been assuming "congested area" = pretty much wall to wall development with streets being the best option for emergency landing. "Other that congested area" = I took to mean that there are at least several open areas at most times that you could bring an airplane down into without hitting any person or property. I've always figured that any area marked in yellow on the sectional is going to be considered a "congested area". That gives you some place to start, but there's lots of places that aren't yellow which are going to be considered a "congested area". The FAA has consistently said the determination will be made on a case-by-case basis. So the way I figure it the answer to your question is the same one for "should I go around?" If you have to ask yourself the question, the answer is always "yes". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
that was the rule given to me when I first started flying over 30yrs ago..
but the charts do not keep up with rapid growth.. if you can't land without touching something other than earth.. it's congested. BT "Mike" wrote in message news:7oddk.720$HY.194@trnddc01... "Dallas" wrote in message ... What's your opinion, is this a congested area or not? http://tinyurl.com/3okuon My take is that this is an "other than congested area", but a recent article in AOPA magazine discussing an FAA ruling gives congested area a pretty broad definition. I've been assuming "congested area" = pretty much wall to wall development with streets being the best option for emergency landing. "Other that congested area" = I took to mean that there are at least several open areas at most times that you could bring an airplane down into without hitting any person or property. I've always figured that any area marked in yellow on the sectional is going to be considered a "congested area". That gives you some place to start, but there's lots of places that aren't yellow which are going to be considered a "congested area". The FAA has consistently said the determination will be made on a case-by-case basis. So the way I figure it the answer to your question is the same one for "should I go around?" If you have to ask yourself the question, the answer is always "yes". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BT" wrote
that was the rule given to me when I first started flying over 30yrs ago.. but the charts do not keep up with rapid growth.. Just to not confuse those that don't know, the yellow on the sectional chart indicates the area that could be expected to be illuminated at night by street lights, lights in buildings, etc. It is an aid to night visual navigation. Bob Moore |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jul 2008 12:09:47 GMT, Robert Moore wrote:
Just to not confuse those that don't know, the yellow on the sectional chart indicates the area that could be expected to be illuminated at night by street lights, Wow... I'll bet even the DPE that gave me my check ride couldn't have answered that one. I've heard the question asked many times, but never got an answer. -- Dallas |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dallas" wrote in message
.. . On 10 Jul 2008 12:09:47 GMT, Robert Moore wrote: Just to not confuse those that don't know, the yellow on the sectional chart indicates the area that could be expected to be illuminated at night by street lights, Wow... I'll bet even the DPE that gave me my check ride couldn't have answered that one. I'd be very surprised if he didn't. That's how you navigate visually at night. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dallas wrote:
On 10 Jul 2008 12:09:47 GMT, Robert Moore wrote: Just to not confuse those that don't know, the yellow on the sectional chart indicates the area that could be expected to be illuminated at night by street lights, Wow... I'll bet even the DPE that gave me my check ride couldn't have answered that one. I've heard the question asked many times, but never got an answer. Really? That was taught to me the first time a sectional was displayed in ground school. (1979) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Gig 601Xl Builder wrote in news:cZ6dnfAM49GRw- : Dallas wrote: On 10 Jul 2008 12:09:47 GMT, Robert Moore wrote: Just to not confuse those that don't know, the yellow on the sectional chart indicates the area that could be expected to be illuminated at night by street lights, Wow... I'll bet even the DPE that gave me my check ride couldn't have answered that one. I've heard the question asked many times, but never got an answer. Really? That was taught to me the first time a sectional was displayed in ground school. (1979) Historic though that may have been,I'm relatively certain that sectionals were taught in groundschools before that! Bertie Don't be a dick Bertie. You and everyone that can read knew what I meant. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jul 2008 12:09:47 GMT, Robert Moore wrote:
Just to not confuse those that don't know, the yellow on the sectional chart indicates the area that could be expected to be illuminated at night by street lights, lights in buildings, etc. It is an aid to night visual navigation. I found a reference which doesn't state it that way. Mine you, this reference just comes from a post in another forum, but he claims to quote the map makers: "The "yellow" area on the charts is supposed to correspond to developed urbanized areas. The only significant change regarding charting in these "yellow" areas involves the depiction of obstructions. Generally, obstructions 201' and higher above the ground are depicted on the charts. However in these "yellow" areas, only obstructions 300' and higher above the ground are depicted. Sincerely, Rick Fecht National Aeronautical Charting Office Visual Chart Branch 301-713-2953 Ext-126" Source: http://forums.piperowner.org/read/7/21716/21731/quote=1 -- Dallas |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dallas wrote:
On 10 Jul 2008 12:09:47 GMT, Robert Moore wrote: Just to not confuse those that don't know, the yellow on the sectional chart indicates the area that could be expected to be illuminated at night by street lights, lights in buildings, etc. It is an aid to night visual navigation. I found a reference which doesn't state it that way. Mine you, this reference just comes from a post in another forum, but he claims to quote the map makers: "The "yellow" area on the charts is supposed to correspond to developed urbanized areas. The only significant change regarding charting in these "yellow" areas involves the depiction of obstructions. Generally, obstructions 201' and higher above the ground are depicted on the charts. However in these "yellow" areas, only obstructions 300' and higher above the ground are depicted. Seems to me the developed urbanized areas are the areas that could be expected to be illuminated at night by street lights, lights in buildings, etc. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Right seat NY area to Boca Raton area | doylflier | Piloting | 0 | May 30th 07 01:06 PM |
low over congested area near AFB? | [email protected] | Piloting | 8 | February 19th 06 08:08 PM |
Anyone ever fly from SF Bay Area to Seattle area? | Cecil Chapman | Piloting | 6 | December 24th 04 01:54 AM |
Flying Thru Congested Areas | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 64 | January 9th 04 04:58 PM |
FA: Congested Airspace: A Pilot's Guide | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 10th 03 05:51 PM |