|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
July 27th 08, 03:09 AM
posted to rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
IFR to Oshkosh without an IFR reservation
Paul Tomblin wrote:
Then why doesn't the SBM airport that require a reservation? Why does the NOTAM say you only need a reservation within 30nm of OSH, and FAH (and SBM) is 33nm from OSH? Don't try to look at this logically. If logic had come into play Milwaukee approach wouldn't have the airspace. 
|
|
#2
July 27th 08, 03:19 PM
posted to rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
|
IFR to Oshkosh without an IFR reservation
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
... Paul Tomblin wrote: Then why doesn't the SBM airport that require a reservation? Why does the NOTAM say you only need a reservation within 30nm of OSH, and FAH (and SBM) is 33nm from OSH? Don't try to look at this logically. If logic had come into play Milwaukee approach wouldn't have the airspace. That may be because Milwaukee approach has better radar coverage, but another guess would be they did it to up the traffic count.
|
|
#3
July 27th 08, 10:58 PM
posted to rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
|
IFR to Oshkosh without an IFR reservation
Mike wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ... Paul Tomblin wrote: Then why doesn't the SBM airport that require a reservation? Why does the NOTAM say you only need a reservation within 30nm of OSH, and FAH (and SBM) is 33nm from OSH? Don't try to look at this logically. If logic had come into play Milwaukee approach wouldn't have the airspace. That may be because Milwaukee approach has better radar coverage, but another guess would be they did it to up the traffic count. It was forced on MKE approach to free up space in ZAU.
|
|
#4
July 27th 08, 11:44 PM
posted to rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
|
IFR to Oshkosh without an IFR reservation
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
m... Mike wrote: "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ... Paul Tomblin wrote: Then why doesn't the SBM airport that require a reservation? Why does the NOTAM say you only need a reservation within 30nm of OSH, and FAH (and SBM) is 33nm from OSH? Don't try to look at this logically. If logic had come into play Milwaukee approach wouldn't have the airspace. That may be because Milwaukee approach has better radar coverage, but another guess would be they did it to up the traffic count. It was forced on MKE approach to free up space in ZAU. Well, "Center" means the "Center of the Universe", right?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Monday 073007 in Oshkosh - Going Home [10/10] - "Departing Oshkosh - U2 abeam, showing actual angle of climb.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 4 | August 2nd 07 08:57 PM |
| Monday 073007 in Oshkosh - Going Home [1/1] - "4 F22s depart Oshkosh, all with same tail number.jpg" yEnc (3/3) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 2nd 07 04:44 AM |
| Monday 073007 in Oshkosh - Going Home [09/10] - "Departing Oshkosh - U2 makes ferocious noise taking off.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 2nd 07 04:40 AM |
| Monday 073007 in Oshkosh - Going Home [07/10] - "Departing Oshkosh - KC135 'Upset 77' gear stowed.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 2nd 07 04:39 AM |
| Monday 073007 in Oshkosh - Going Home [01/10] - "Departing Oshkosh - Airborne Inaging DC3C.jpg" yEnc (0/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 2nd 07 04:39 AM |
Hybrid Mode
